Message ID | 1410837304-13952-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> > > Add some simple test cases for noreorder behaving like > -fno-toplevel-reorder and -fno-toplevel-reorder still working. > Unfortunately there's no easy way to check for output order in DG, > so we just check for existence. OK, thanks! Honza > > gcc/testsuite/: > > 2014-09-15 Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> > > * gcc.dg/noreorder.c: New test. > * gcc.dg/noreorder2.c: New test. > * gcc.dg/noreorder3.c: New test. > * gcc.dg/noreorder4.c: New test. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c | 11 +++++++++++ > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c | 10 ++++++++++ > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c | 5 +++++ > 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..7d40a29 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c > @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ > + > +/* The function order in this file is opposite from what the cgraph > + topological sort would output. So we can check the order is preserved. */ > + > +extern void f2(int); > +static int func2(void); > + > +#ifndef NOREORDER > +#define NOREORDER __attribute__((no_reorder)) > +#endif > + > +asm("firstasm"); > + > +NOREORDER __attribute__((noinline)) int bozo(void) > +{ > + f2(3); > + func2(); > +} > + > +asm("jukjuk"); > + > +NOREORDER __attribute__((noinline)) static int func1(void) > +{ > + f2(1); > +} > + > +asm("barbar"); > + > +NOREORDER __attribute__((noinline)) static int func2(void) > +{ > + func1(); > +} > + > +asm("lastasm"); > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "firstasm.*bozo.*jukjuk.*func1.*barbar.*func2.*lastasm" } } */ > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..558361b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder" } */ > + > +__attribute__((no_reorder)) int foobar; > + > +static int barbar; > +int bozo; > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "foobar" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bozo" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "barbar" } } */ > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..a0b637f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ > + > +__attribute__((no_reorder)) int foobar; > +static int barbar; > +int bozo; > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "foobar" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bozo" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "barbar" } } */ > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..632fc33 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder" } */ > +#define NOREORDER > +#include "noreorder.c" > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bozo.*jukjuk.*func1.*barbar.*func2" } } */ > -- > 2.1.0
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7d40a29 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ + +/* The function order in this file is opposite from what the cgraph + topological sort would output. So we can check the order is preserved. */ + +extern void f2(int); +static int func2(void); + +#ifndef NOREORDER +#define NOREORDER __attribute__((no_reorder)) +#endif + +asm("firstasm"); + +NOREORDER __attribute__((noinline)) int bozo(void) +{ + f2(3); + func2(); +} + +asm("jukjuk"); + +NOREORDER __attribute__((noinline)) static int func1(void) +{ + f2(1); +} + +asm("barbar"); + +NOREORDER __attribute__((noinline)) static int func2(void) +{ + func1(); +} + +asm("lastasm"); + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "firstasm.*bozo.*jukjuk.*func1.*barbar.*func2.*lastasm" } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..558361b --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder" } */ + +__attribute__((no_reorder)) int foobar; + +static int barbar; +int bozo; + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "foobar" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bozo" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "barbar" } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a0b637f --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ + +__attribute__((no_reorder)) int foobar; +static int barbar; +int bozo; + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "foobar" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bozo" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "barbar" } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..632fc33 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder" } */ +#define NOREORDER +#include "noreorder.c" +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bozo.*jukjuk.*func1.*barbar.*func2" } } */
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Add some simple test cases for noreorder behaving like -fno-toplevel-reorder and -fno-toplevel-reorder still working. Unfortunately there's no easy way to check for output order in DG, so we just check for existence. gcc/testsuite/: 2014-09-15 Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> * gcc.dg/noreorder.c: New test. * gcc.dg/noreorder2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/noreorder3.c: New test. * gcc.dg/noreorder4.c: New test. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c | 11 +++++++++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c | 10 ++++++++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder3.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noreorder4.c