[wwwdocs] Purge CVS from gccmission.html

Hopefully an obvious amendment.

Will test out the new git repo soon!

Thanks,

Kyrill

Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com> writes:
> Hopefully an obvious amendment.
>
> Will test out the new git repo soon!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kyrill
>
> commit ddf1524244ac30ab3473d0df6d8e76d5c9a42276
> Author: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
> Date:   Wed Oct 9 16:15:00 2019 +0100
>
>     [gcccmission.html] Replace cvs with version control
>
> diff --git a/htdocs/gccmission.html b/htdocs/gccmission.html
> index 25aa3ad0..aaaa6aef 100644
> --- a/htdocs/gccmission.html
> +++ b/htdocs/gccmission.html
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ GCC.</p>
>       as long as they accept the groundrules.</li>
>   </ul></li>
>  <li>Open mailing lists.</li>
> -<li>Developer friendly tools and procedures (i.e., cvs, multiple
> +<li>Developer friendly tools and procedures (i.e. version control, multiple
>      maintainers, etc).</li>
>  <li>Conflicts of interest exist for many GCC developers; the
>      developers as well as the <a href="steering.html">GCC Steering

Not sure whether this is supposed to be a living document or just a record
of what the mission statement was when egcs became GCC.  The date at the top
is still 1999-04-22.

Richard

On 10/10/19 10:18 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com> writes:
>> Hopefully an obvious amendment.
>>
>> Will test out the new git repo soon!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kyrill
>>
>> commit ddf1524244ac30ab3473d0df6d8e76d5c9a42276
>> Author: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>> Date:   Wed Oct 9 16:15:00 2019 +0100
>>
>>      [gcccmission.html] Replace cvs with version control
>>
>> diff --git a/htdocs/gccmission.html b/htdocs/gccmission.html
>> index 25aa3ad0..aaaa6aef 100644
>> --- a/htdocs/gccmission.html
>> +++ b/htdocs/gccmission.html
>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ GCC.</p>
>>        as long as they accept the groundrules.</li>
>>    </ul></li>
>>   <li>Open mailing lists.</li>
>> -<li>Developer friendly tools and procedures (i.e., cvs, multiple
>> +<li>Developer friendly tools and procedures (i.e. version control, multiple
>>       maintainers, etc).</li>
>>   <li>Conflicts of interest exist for many GCC developers; the
>>       developers as well as the <a href="steering.html">GCC Steering
> Not sure whether this is supposed to be a living document or just a record
> of what the mission statement was when egcs became GCC.  The date at the top
> is still 1999-04-22.

Ah, I hadn't considered that. Good thing I didn't get around to 
committing it just yet.

Gerald, do you happen to know?

Thanks,

Kyrill

>
> Richard

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> Not sure whether this is supposed to be a living document or just a 
>> record of what the mission statement was when egcs became GCC.  The 
>> date at the top is still 1999-04-22.
> Ah, I hadn't considered that. Good thing I didn't get around to 
> committing it just yet.
> 
> Gerald, do you happen to know?

Yes, this is not really a living document, but more reference 
(though those bits generally are still revelant).

Looking at your patch, indeed CVS is something less and less
known, and CVS vs whatever else wasn't the point, so how about
if we go with your proposal and just write "[version control]", 
i.e., with the angle brackets commonly used in quotes to indicate 
when something is not verbatim, but adjusted for context?

Surely would be fine with me.

Thanks,
Gerald

On 10/10/19 7:37 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>> Not sure whether this is supposed to be a living document or just a
>>> record of what the mission statement was when egcs became GCC.  The
>>> date at the top is still 1999-04-22.
>> Ah, I hadn't considered that. Good thing I didn't get around to
>> committing it just yet.
>>
>> Gerald, do you happen to know?
> Yes, this is not really a living document, but more reference
> (though those bits generally are still revelant).
>
> Looking at your patch, indeed CVS is something less and less
> known, and CVS vs whatever else wasn't the point, so how about
> if we go with your proposal and just write "[version control]",
> i.e., with the angle brackets commonly used in quotes to indicate
> when something is not verbatim, but adjusted for context?
>
> Surely would be fine with me.

I see, thanks. Here's a proposed patch then.

Thanks,

Kyrill

> Thanks,
> Gerald

On Mon, 14 Oct 2019, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> Surely would be fine with me.
> I see, thanks. Here's a proposed patch then.

My previous mail was meant to pre-approve your patch. ;-)

Yes, this is okay.

Thanks,
Gerald

On 10/15/19 5:29 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2019, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>> Surely would be fine with me.
>> I see, thanks. Here's a proposed patch then.
> My previous mail was meant to pre-approve your patch. ;-)

Right, I meant to take it as such, but got distracted with the committing :)

Committed now.

Kyrill

>
> Yes, this is okay.
>
> Thanks,
> Gerald