| Message ID | 0896b253faee59a43b4769af1486547aa4c34134.1486654190.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-adde-int128.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-adde-int128.c index 4f951a9..3538b9c 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-adde-int128.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-adde-int128.c @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ -/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc64*-*-* } } } */ -/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */ +/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc64*-*-* && p8vector_hw } } } */ /* { dg-skip-if "do not override -mcpu" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*" } { "-mcpu=power8" } } */ /* { dg-options "-mcpu=power8 -O3" } */
This is a runtime testcase so it should test p8vector_hw instead of powerpc_p8vector_ok, or it will fail with an illegal instruction on older processors. Tested on powerpc64-linux {-m32,-m64}. Is this okay for trunk? Segher 2017-02-09 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-adde-int128.c: Use p8vector_hw instead of powerpc_p8vector_ok. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-adde-int128.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)