| Message ID | 000101cf3295$b837bc10$28a73430$@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On 02/26/14 01:54, Terry Guo wrote: > Hi There, > > As the assembler directive ".code 16" equals ".thumb", this small patch is > going to redefine the ASM_APP_OFF in a cleaner way. Tested with GCC > regression test and no regressions. Is it OK to current trunk or shall we > wait until the release-branch mode end? Ok for stage1. regards Ramana
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h index 288ff8b..f9d1537 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h @@ -2132,8 +2132,7 @@ extern int making_const_table; do { cfun->machine->thumb1_cc_insn = NULL_RTX; } while (0) #undef ASM_APP_OFF -#define ASM_APP_OFF (TARGET_THUMB1 ? "\t.code\t16\n" : \ - TARGET_THUMB2 ? "\t.thumb\n" : "") +#define ASM_APP_OFF (TARGET_ARM ? "" : "\t.thumb\n") /* Output a push or a pop instruction (only used when profiling). We can't push STATIC_CHAIN_REGNUM (r12) directly with Thumb-1. We know
Hi There, As the assembler directive ".code 16" equals ".thumb", this small patch is going to redefine the ASM_APP_OFF in a cleaner way. Tested with GCC regression test and no regressions. Is it OK to current trunk or shall we wait until the release-branch mode end? BR, Terry 2014-02-25 Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com> * config/arm/arm.h (ASM_APP_OFF): Re-define it in a cleaner way. From fd607bf3a164e885a6e16a1028feff11b8a653bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:08:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] patch --- gcc/config/arm/arm.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)