| Message ID | 20190609200147.27209-1-dimitar@dinux.eu |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | New backend for the TI PRU processor | expand |
On 6/9/19 2:01 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > This is the latest patch set for adding TI PRU I/O processor backend to GCC. > Comments from all previous series have been addressed [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. > > Test results can be downloaded from here: > http://dinux.eu/gnupru/testresults/20190607-c16eb7019be/ > > Changes since patch series v5 [5] are minimal: > > - A few whitespace and comment fixes. > - doloop_end_internal length expression fix. > - Define TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED hook for PRU. > - Use uniform naming for the PRU register number constants. > > [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00775.html > [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01779.html > [3] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg00927.html > [4] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-09/msg00392.html > [5] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg00979.html > > Regards, > Dimitar > > Dimitar Dimitrov (10): > Initial TI PRU GCC port > Initial TI PRU libgcc port > testsuite: Add PRU tests > testsuite: Add check for overflowed IMEM region to testsuite > testsuite: Add check for unsupported TI ABI PRU features to testsuite > testsuite: Remove PRU from test cases requiring hosted environment > testsuite: Define PRU stack usage > testsuite: Mark that PRU has one-cycle jumps > testsuite: Mark that PRU uses all function pointer bits > testsuite: Mark testsuite that PRU has different calling convention [ ... ] My recollection was this was all ready to go, so I'm going to ack with the only pre-commit requirement being to fix the issue Andreas pointed out with the 20101011-1.c test change. Can you please fill out the write-after-approval form (list me as your sponsor) https://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi Jeff
On вторник, 11 юни 2019 г. 14:04:41 EEST Jeff Law wrote: > On 6/9/19 2:01 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > > This is the latest patch set for adding TI PRU I/O processor backend to > > GCC. Comments from all previous series have been addressed [1], [2], [3], > > [4], [5].> > > Test results can be downloaded from here: > > http://dinux.eu/gnupru/testresults/20190607-c16eb7019be/ > > > > Changes since patch series v5 [5] are minimal: > > > > - A few whitespace and comment fixes. > > - doloop_end_internal length expression fix. > > - Define TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED hook for PRU. > > - Use uniform naming for the PRU register number constants. > > > > [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00775.html > > [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01779.html > > [3] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg00927.html > > [4] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-09/msg00392.html > > [5] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg00979.html > > > > Regards, > > Dimitar > > > > Dimitar Dimitrov (10): > > Initial TI PRU GCC port > > Initial TI PRU libgcc port > > testsuite: Add PRU tests > > testsuite: Add check for overflowed IMEM region to testsuite > > testsuite: Add check for unsupported TI ABI PRU features to testsuite > > testsuite: Remove PRU from test cases requiring hosted environment > > testsuite: Define PRU stack usage > > testsuite: Mark that PRU has one-cycle jumps > > testsuite: Mark that PRU uses all function pointer bits > > testsuite: Mark testsuite that PRU has different calling convention > > [ ... ] > My recollection was this was all ready to go, so I'm going to ack with > the only pre-commit requirement being to fix the issue Andreas pointed > out with the 20101011-1.c test change. > > Can you please fill out the write-after-approval form (list me as your > sponsor) > > https://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi > > Jeff I committed all the patches to trunk. The 20101011-1.c issue was fixed. Thanks, Dimitar