| Message ID | 20170601103735.4857-3-colin.king@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
On 2017-06-01 03:37 AM, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > The disassembled output from ACPICA has changed a little, so sync > the tests with the new output from ACPICA 20170531. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > --- > fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log b/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log > index 7461ffd8..7444685d 100644 > --- a/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log > +++ b/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log > @@ -20,6 +20,25 @@ syntaxcheck 00243| { > syntaxcheck 00244| If (_OSI ("Linux")) > syntaxcheck 00245| { > syntaxcheck ========================================================== > +syntaxcheck FAILED [HIGH] AMLAsmASL_MSG_NAME_EXISTS: Test 1, Assembler > +syntaxcheck error in line 661 > +syntaxcheck Line | AML source > +syntaxcheck ---------------------------------------------------------- > +syntaxcheck 00658| > +syntaxcheck 00659| Scope (_PR) > +syntaxcheck 00660| { > +syntaxcheck 00661| Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x00001010, 0x06){} > +syntaxcheck | ^ > +syntaxcheck | Error 6074: Name already exists in scope (CPU0) > +syntaxcheck 00662| Processor (CPU1, 0x01, 0x00001010, 0x06){} > +syntaxcheck 00663| Method (RPPC, 0, NotSerialized) > +syntaxcheck 00664| { > +syntaxcheck ========================================================== > +syntaxcheck > +syntaxcheck ADVICE: (for Error #6074, ASL_MSG_NAME_EXISTS): The name > +syntaxcheck already exists in this scope. The compiler will continue > +syntaxcheck to process it. > +syntaxcheck > syntaxcheck FAILED [MEDIUM] AMLAsmUnknown: Test 1, Assembler warning > syntaxcheck in line 692 > syntaxcheck Line | AML source > @@ -58,7 +77,7 @@ syntaxcheck line 722 > syntaxcheck Line | AML source > syntaxcheck ---------------------------------------------------------- > syntaxcheck 00719| { > -syntaxcheck 00720| 0x01, 0x14, 0x03, 0x00 /* .... */ > +syntaxcheck 00720| 0x01, 0x14, 0x03, 0x00 // .... > syntaxcheck 00721| }) > syntaxcheck 00722| Method (WQAC, 1, NotSerialized) > syntaxcheck | ^ > @@ -72,7 +91,7 @@ syntaxcheck line 732 > syntaxcheck Line | AML source > syntaxcheck ---------------------------------------------------------- > syntaxcheck 00729| { > -syntaxcheck 00730| 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 /* .... */ > +syntaxcheck 00730| 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 // .... > syntaxcheck 00731| }) > syntaxcheck 00732| Method (WQBC, 1, NotSerialized) > syntaxcheck | ^ > @@ -385,7 +404,7 @@ syntaxcheck thread enters the method and blocks and then a second > syntaxcheck thread also executes the method, ending up in two attempts > syntaxcheck to create the object and causing a failure. > syntaxcheck > -syntaxcheck Table DSDT (0) reassembly: Found 3 errors, 5 warnings, 14 > +syntaxcheck Table DSDT (0) reassembly: Found 4 errors, 5 warnings, 14 > syntaxcheck remarks. > syntaxcheck > syntaxcheck > @@ -756,6 +775,6 @@ syntaxcheck remarks. > syntaxcheck > syntaxcheck > syntaxcheck ========================================================== > -syntaxcheck 2 passed, 42 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0 > +syntaxcheck 2 passed, 43 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0 > syntaxcheck info only. > syntaxcheck ========================================================== > Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
On 06/01/2017 06:37 PM, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > The disassembled output from ACPICA has changed a little, so sync > the tests with the new output from ACPICA 20170531. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > --- > fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log b/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log > index 7461ffd8..7444685d 100644 > --- a/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log > +++ b/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log > @@ -20,6 +20,25 @@ syntaxcheck 00243| { > syntaxcheck 00244| If (_OSI ("Linux")) > syntaxcheck 00245| { > syntaxcheck ========================================================== > +syntaxcheck FAILED [HIGH] AMLAsmASL_MSG_NAME_EXISTS: Test 1, Assembler > +syntaxcheck error in line 661 > +syntaxcheck Line | AML source > +syntaxcheck ---------------------------------------------------------- > +syntaxcheck 00658| > +syntaxcheck 00659| Scope (_PR) > +syntaxcheck 00660| { > +syntaxcheck 00661| Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x00001010, 0x06){} > +syntaxcheck | ^ > +syntaxcheck | Error 6074: Name already exists in scope (CPU0) > +syntaxcheck 00662| Processor (CPU1, 0x01, 0x00001010, 0x06){} > +syntaxcheck 00663| Method (RPPC, 0, NotSerialized) > +syntaxcheck 00664| { > +syntaxcheck ========================================================== > +syntaxcheck > +syntaxcheck ADVICE: (for Error #6074, ASL_MSG_NAME_EXISTS): The name > +syntaxcheck already exists in this scope. The compiler will continue > +syntaxcheck to process it. > +syntaxcheck > syntaxcheck FAILED [MEDIUM] AMLAsmUnknown: Test 1, Assembler warning > syntaxcheck in line 692 > syntaxcheck Line | AML source > @@ -58,7 +77,7 @@ syntaxcheck line 722 > syntaxcheck Line | AML source > syntaxcheck ---------------------------------------------------------- > syntaxcheck 00719| { > -syntaxcheck 00720| 0x01, 0x14, 0x03, 0x00 /* .... */ > +syntaxcheck 00720| 0x01, 0x14, 0x03, 0x00 // .... > syntaxcheck 00721| }) > syntaxcheck 00722| Method (WQAC, 1, NotSerialized) > syntaxcheck | ^ > @@ -72,7 +91,7 @@ syntaxcheck line 732 > syntaxcheck Line | AML source > syntaxcheck ---------------------------------------------------------- > syntaxcheck 00729| { > -syntaxcheck 00730| 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 /* .... */ > +syntaxcheck 00730| 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 // .... > syntaxcheck 00731| }) > syntaxcheck 00732| Method (WQBC, 1, NotSerialized) > syntaxcheck | ^ > @@ -385,7 +404,7 @@ syntaxcheck thread enters the method and blocks and then a second > syntaxcheck thread also executes the method, ending up in two attempts > syntaxcheck to create the object and causing a failure. > syntaxcheck > -syntaxcheck Table DSDT (0) reassembly: Found 3 errors, 5 warnings, 14 > +syntaxcheck Table DSDT (0) reassembly: Found 4 errors, 5 warnings, 14 > syntaxcheck remarks. > syntaxcheck > syntaxcheck > @@ -756,6 +775,6 @@ syntaxcheck remarks. > syntaxcheck > syntaxcheck > syntaxcheck ========================================================== > -syntaxcheck 2 passed, 42 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0 > +syntaxcheck 2 passed, 43 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0 > syntaxcheck info only. > syntaxcheck ========================================================== > Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@canonical.com>
diff --git a/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log b/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log index 7461ffd8..7444685d 100644 --- a/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log +++ b/fwts-test/syntaxcheck-0001/syntaxcheck-0001.log @@ -20,6 +20,25 @@ syntaxcheck 00243| { syntaxcheck 00244| If (_OSI ("Linux")) syntaxcheck 00245| { syntaxcheck ========================================================== +syntaxcheck FAILED [HIGH] AMLAsmASL_MSG_NAME_EXISTS: Test 1, Assembler +syntaxcheck error in line 661 +syntaxcheck Line | AML source +syntaxcheck ---------------------------------------------------------- +syntaxcheck 00658| +syntaxcheck 00659| Scope (_PR) +syntaxcheck 00660| { +syntaxcheck 00661| Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x00001010, 0x06){} +syntaxcheck | ^ +syntaxcheck | Error 6074: Name already exists in scope (CPU0) +syntaxcheck 00662| Processor (CPU1, 0x01, 0x00001010, 0x06){} +syntaxcheck 00663| Method (RPPC, 0, NotSerialized) +syntaxcheck 00664| { +syntaxcheck ========================================================== +syntaxcheck +syntaxcheck ADVICE: (for Error #6074, ASL_MSG_NAME_EXISTS): The name +syntaxcheck already exists in this scope. The compiler will continue +syntaxcheck to process it. +syntaxcheck syntaxcheck FAILED [MEDIUM] AMLAsmUnknown: Test 1, Assembler warning syntaxcheck in line 692 syntaxcheck Line | AML source @@ -58,7 +77,7 @@ syntaxcheck line 722 syntaxcheck Line | AML source syntaxcheck ---------------------------------------------------------- syntaxcheck 00719| { -syntaxcheck 00720| 0x01, 0x14, 0x03, 0x00 /* .... */ +syntaxcheck 00720| 0x01, 0x14, 0x03, 0x00 // .... syntaxcheck 00721| }) syntaxcheck 00722| Method (WQAC, 1, NotSerialized) syntaxcheck | ^ @@ -72,7 +91,7 @@ syntaxcheck line 732 syntaxcheck Line | AML source syntaxcheck ---------------------------------------------------------- syntaxcheck 00729| { -syntaxcheck 00730| 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 /* .... */ +syntaxcheck 00730| 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 // .... syntaxcheck 00731| }) syntaxcheck 00732| Method (WQBC, 1, NotSerialized) syntaxcheck | ^ @@ -385,7 +404,7 @@ syntaxcheck thread enters the method and blocks and then a second syntaxcheck thread also executes the method, ending up in two attempts syntaxcheck to create the object and causing a failure. syntaxcheck -syntaxcheck Table DSDT (0) reassembly: Found 3 errors, 5 warnings, 14 +syntaxcheck Table DSDT (0) reassembly: Found 4 errors, 5 warnings, 14 syntaxcheck remarks. syntaxcheck syntaxcheck @@ -756,6 +775,6 @@ syntaxcheck remarks. syntaxcheck syntaxcheck syntaxcheck ========================================================== -syntaxcheck 2 passed, 42 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0 +syntaxcheck 2 passed, 43 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0 syntaxcheck info only. syntaxcheck ==========================================================