diff mbox

[02/46] acpi: battery: reduce scope of variables

Message ID 1421175905-17035-3-git-send-email-colin.king@canonical.com
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Colin Ian King Jan. 13, 2015, 7:04 p.m. UTC
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

cppcheck is picking up some minor style issues which can
be easily fixed:

[src/acpi/battery/battery.c:70]:
	(style) The scope of the variable 'buffer' can be reduced.
[src/acpi/battery/battery.c:133]:
	(style) The scope of the variable 'new_value' can be reduced.
[src/acpi/battery/battery.c:155]:
	(style) The scope of the variable 'new_value' can be reduced.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 src/acpi/battery/battery.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Ivan Hu Jan. 15, 2015, 7:27 a.m. UTC | #1
On 01/14/2015 03:04 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> cppcheck is picking up some minor style issues which can
> be easily fixed:
>
> [src/acpi/battery/battery.c:70]:
> 	(style) The scope of the variable 'buffer' can be reduced.
> [src/acpi/battery/battery.c:133]:
> 	(style) The scope of the variable 'new_value' can be reduced.
> [src/acpi/battery/battery.c:155]:
> 	(style) The scope of the variable 'new_value' can be reduced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>   src/acpi/battery/battery.c | 12 +++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/acpi/battery/battery.c b/src/acpi/battery/battery.c
> index e492581..dc89c75 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/battery/battery.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/battery/battery.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ static int wait_for_acpi_event(fwts_framework *fw, char *name)
>   	int events = 0;
>   	int matching = 0;
>   	size_t len;
> -	char *buffer;
>   	int i;
>
>   	fwts_gpe *gpes_start;
> @@ -84,7 +83,9 @@ static int wait_for_acpi_event(fwts_framework *fw, char *name)
>   		return FWTS_ERROR;
>   	}
>
> -	for (i=0;i<=20;i++) {
> +	for (i = 0;i <= 20; i++) {
> +		char *buffer;
> +
>   		if ((buffer = fwts_acpi_event_read(fd, &len, 1)) != NULL) {
>   			char *str;
>   			if ((str = strstr(buffer, "battery")) != NULL) {
> @@ -130,13 +131,14 @@ static void check_charging(fwts_framework *fw, int index, char *name)
>   {
>   	int i;
>   	/* when we get here we KNOW the state is "charging" */
> -	uint32_t initial_value, new_value;
> +	uint32_t initial_value;
>
>   	fwts_printf(fw, "==== Waiting to see if battery '%s' charges ====\n", name);
>
>   	initial_value = get_full(fw, index);
> -	for (i=0; i<=120; i++) {
> -		new_value = get_full(fw, index);
> +	for (i=0; i <= 120; i++) {
> +		uint32_t new_value = get_full(fw, index);
> +
>   		if (new_value>initial_value) {
>   			fwts_passed(fw, "Battery %s charge is incrementing as expected.", name);
>   			return;
>

Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@canonical.com>
Keng-Yu Lin Jan. 20, 2015, 6:42 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:27 PM, IvanHu <ivan.hu@canonical.com> wrote:
> On 01/14/2015 03:04 AM, Colin King wrote:
>>
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> cppcheck is picking up some minor style issues which can
>> be easily fixed:
>>
>> [src/acpi/battery/battery.c:70]:
>>         (style) The scope of the variable 'buffer' can be reduced.
>> [src/acpi/battery/battery.c:133]:
>>         (style) The scope of the variable 'new_value' can be reduced.
>> [src/acpi/battery/battery.c:155]:
>>         (style) The scope of the variable 'new_value' can be reduced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>> ---
>>   src/acpi/battery/battery.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/acpi/battery/battery.c b/src/acpi/battery/battery.c
>> index e492581..dc89c75 100644
>> --- a/src/acpi/battery/battery.c
>> +++ b/src/acpi/battery/battery.c
>> @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ static int wait_for_acpi_event(fwts_framework *fw, char
>> *name)
>>         int events = 0;
>>         int matching = 0;
>>         size_t len;
>> -       char *buffer;
>>         int i;
>>
>>         fwts_gpe *gpes_start;
>> @@ -84,7 +83,9 @@ static int wait_for_acpi_event(fwts_framework *fw, char
>> *name)
>>                 return FWTS_ERROR;
>>         }
>>
>> -       for (i=0;i<=20;i++) {
>> +       for (i = 0;i <= 20; i++) {
>> +               char *buffer;
>> +
>>                 if ((buffer = fwts_acpi_event_read(fd, &len, 1)) != NULL)
>> {
>>                         char *str;
>>                         if ((str = strstr(buffer, "battery")) != NULL) {
>> @@ -130,13 +131,14 @@ static void check_charging(fwts_framework *fw, int
>> index, char *name)
>>   {
>>         int i;
>>         /* when we get here we KNOW the state is "charging" */
>> -       uint32_t initial_value, new_value;
>> +       uint32_t initial_value;
>>
>>         fwts_printf(fw, "==== Waiting to see if battery '%s' charges
>> ====\n", name);
>>
>>         initial_value = get_full(fw, index);
>> -       for (i=0; i<=120; i++) {
>> -               new_value = get_full(fw, index);
>> +       for (i=0; i <= 120; i++) {
>> +               uint32_t new_value = get_full(fw, index);
>> +
>>                 if (new_value>initial_value) {
>>                         fwts_passed(fw, "Battery %s charge is incrementing
>> as expected.", name);
>>                         return;
>>
>
> Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@canonical.com>
>
Acked-by: Keng-Yu Lin <kengyu@canonical.com>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/src/acpi/battery/battery.c b/src/acpi/battery/battery.c
index e492581..dc89c75 100644
--- a/src/acpi/battery/battery.c
+++ b/src/acpi/battery/battery.c
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@  static int wait_for_acpi_event(fwts_framework *fw, char *name)
 	int events = 0;
 	int matching = 0;
 	size_t len;
-	char *buffer;
 	int i;
 
 	fwts_gpe *gpes_start;
@@ -84,7 +83,9 @@  static int wait_for_acpi_event(fwts_framework *fw, char *name)
 		return FWTS_ERROR;
 	}
 
-	for (i=0;i<=20;i++) {
+	for (i = 0;i <= 20; i++) {
+		char *buffer;
+
 		if ((buffer = fwts_acpi_event_read(fd, &len, 1)) != NULL) {
 			char *str;
 			if ((str = strstr(buffer, "battery")) != NULL) {
@@ -130,13 +131,14 @@  static void check_charging(fwts_framework *fw, int index, char *name)
 {
 	int i;
 	/* when we get here we KNOW the state is "charging" */
-	uint32_t initial_value, new_value;
+	uint32_t initial_value;
 
 	fwts_printf(fw, "==== Waiting to see if battery '%s' charges ====\n", name);
 
 	initial_value = get_full(fw, index);
-	for (i=0; i<=120; i++) {
-		new_value = get_full(fw, index);
+	for (i=0; i <= 120; i++) {
+		uint32_t new_value = get_full(fw, index);
+
 		if (new_value>initial_value) {
 			fwts_passed(fw, "Battery %s charge is incrementing as expected.", name);
 			return;