diff mbox series

[1/2] dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Update part number to X1E80100

Message ID 20231117104254.28862-2-quic_sibis@quicinc.com
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series pmdomain: qcom: Update part number to X1E80100 | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
robh/checkpatch warning total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 14 lines checked
robh/patch-applied success
robh/dtbs-check warning build log
robh/dt-meta-schema success

Commit Message

Sibi Sankar Nov. 17, 2023, 10:42 a.m. UTC
Replace SC8380xp with the updated part number (X1E80100).

Fixes: c638b9516abd ("dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add SC8380XP support")
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Nov. 17, 2023, 11:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On 17/11/2023 11:42, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Replace SC8380xp with the updated part number (X1E80100).
> 

You need to explain why. We don't update compatibles based on marketing
wishes.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Sibi Sankar Nov. 17, 2023, 11:46 a.m. UTC | #2
Hey Krzysztof,

Thanks for taking time to review the series.

On 11/17/23 16:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/11/2023 11:42, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> Replace SC8380xp with the updated part number (X1E80100).
>>
> 
> You need to explain why. We don't update compatibles based on marketing
> wishes.

What we imply is that X1E80100 is the part number you would get when you
read out from a Snapdragon X Elite device in the wild, when it is
available and we didn't have this information when we posted out v1.

-Sibi

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Krzysztof Kozlowski Nov. 17, 2023, 12:39 p.m. UTC | #3
On 17/11/2023 12:46, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Hey Krzysztof,
> 
> Thanks for taking time to review the series.
> 
> On 11/17/23 16:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/11/2023 11:42, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>> Replace SC8380xp with the updated part number (X1E80100).
>>>
>>
>> You need to explain why. We don't update compatibles based on marketing
>> wishes.
> 
> What we imply is that X1E80100 is the part number you would get when you
> read out from a Snapdragon X Elite device in the wild, when it is
> available and we didn't have this information when we posted out v1.

The commit msg must explain why.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Konrad Dybcio Nov. 17, 2023, 11:40 p.m. UTC | #4
On 17.11.2023 13:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/11/2023 12:46, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> Hey Krzysztof,
>>
>> Thanks for taking time to review the series.
>>
>> On 11/17/23 16:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 17/11/2023 11:42, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>>> Replace SC8380xp with the updated part number (X1E80100).
>>>>
>>>
>>> You need to explain why. We don't update compatibles based on marketing
>>> wishes.
>>
>> What we imply is that X1E80100 is the part number you would get when you
>> read out from a Snapdragon X Elite device in the wild, when it is
>> available and we didn't have this information when we posted out v1.
> 
> The commit msg must explain why.
(what Krzysztof meant is that your explanation is ok but it needs to be
part of the commit message and not just a reply here)

Moreover, it would also be good to say something like "this binding has
no users and has been erroneusly introduced very recently, so it was
decided that changing it is okay", as this is a rather special case.

Konrad
Sibi Sankar Nov. 20, 2023, 6:52 a.m. UTC | #5
On 11/18/23 05:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 17.11.2023 13:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/11/2023 12:46, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>> Hey Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> Thanks for taking time to review the series.
>>>
>>> On 11/17/23 16:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 17/11/2023 11:42, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>>>> Replace SC8380xp with the updated part number (X1E80100).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You need to explain why. We don't update compatibles based on marketing
>>>> wishes.
>>>
>>> What we imply is that X1E80100 is the part number you would get when you
>>> read out from a Snapdragon X Elite device in the wild, when it is
>>> available and we didn't have this information when we posted out v1.
>>
>> The commit msg must explain why.
> (what Krzysztof meant is that your explanation is ok but it needs to be
> part of the commit message and not just a reply here)
> 
> Moreover, it would also be good to say something like "this binding has
> no users and has been erroneusly introduced very recently, so it was
> decided that changing it is okay", as this is a rather special case.

Thanks, was going to do the same.

-Sibi

> 
> Konrad
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
index da9c5846f4e1..2ff246cf8b81 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@  properties:
           - qcom,sc7280-rpmhpd
           - qcom,sc8180x-rpmhpd
           - qcom,sc8280xp-rpmhpd
-          - qcom,sc8380xp-rpmhpd
           - qcom,sdm660-rpmpd
           - qcom,sdm670-rpmhpd
           - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
@@ -57,6 +56,7 @@  properties:
           - qcom,sm8450-rpmhpd
           - qcom,sm8550-rpmhpd
           - qcom,sm8650-rpmhpd
+          - qcom,x1e80100-rpmhpd
       - items:
           - enum:
               - qcom,msm8937-rpmpd