diff mbox series

[6/8] dt-bindings: mailbox : arm,mhu: Fix arm,scpi example used here

Message ID 20210526182807.548118-7-sudeep.holla@arm.com
State Changes Requested, archived
Headers show
Series dt-bindings: firmware: Convert SCPI and SCMI to json schema | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
robh/checkpatch warning total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 17 lines checked
robh/dt-meta-schema fail build log

Commit Message

Sudeep Holla May 26, 2021, 6:28 p.m. UTC
Now that the arm,scpi binding is converted to YAML format, the following
errors are seen when doing `make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check`

From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scpi.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:
	scpi@2f000000: $nodename:0: 'scpi' was expected
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:
	scpi@2f000000: reg: [[0, 788529152, 0, 512]] is not of type 'object'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:
	scpi@2f000000: 'shmem' is a required property

Fix those error following the SCPI bindings.

Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Rob Herring (Arm) May 27, 2021, 2:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 26 May 2021 19:28:05 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Now that the arm,scpi binding is converted to YAML format, the following
> errors are seen when doing `make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check`
> 
> 

My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-1/soc/scpi: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['arm,scpi']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-1/soc/scpi/power-domains-0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['arm,scpi-power-domains']

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1484218

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.
Sudeep Holla May 27, 2021, 4:25 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 09:23:27AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2021 19:28:05 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Now that the arm,scpi binding is converted to YAML format, the following
> > errors are seen when doing `make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check`
> > 
> > 
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-1/soc/scpi: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['arm,scpi']
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-1/soc/scpi/power-domains-0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['arm,scpi-power-domains']
> 
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1484218
> 
> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> series is generally the most recent rc1.
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
> 
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 
> Please check and re-submit.
> 

Just curious if this is built as past of the series as I am unable to hit
this issue. However I get this if I remove 5/8 which is adding the scpi
yaml schema. Am I missing something ?
Rob Herring (Arm) May 27, 2021, 8:07 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:25 AM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 09:23:27AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 May 2021 19:28:05 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > Now that the arm,scpi binding is converted to YAML format, the following
> > > errors are seen when doing `make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check`
> > >
> > >
> >
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> >
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> >
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-1/soc/scpi: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['arm,scpi']
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-1/soc/scpi/power-domains-0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['arm,scpi-power-domains']
> >
> > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1484218
> >
> > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> > series is generally the most recent rc1.
> >
> > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> > error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> > date:
> >
> > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> >
> > Please check and re-submit.
> >
>
> Just curious if this is built as past of the series as I am unable to hit
> this issue. However I get this if I remove 5/8 which is adding the scpi
> yaml schema. Am I missing something ?

The automated check does try to apply series, but runs checks a patch
at time and it resets the base if it gets an error on a patch. I think
switching patch 5 and 6 order should fix things. Don't worry about
that yet, I'll look at the rest of the series.

Rob
Sudeep Holla May 31, 2021, 8:17 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 03:07:39PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:25 AM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:

[...]

> > Just curious if this is built as past of the series as I am unable to hit
> > this issue. However I get this if I remove 5/8 which is adding the scpi
> > yaml schema. Am I missing something ?
>
> The automated check does try to apply series, but runs checks a patch
> at time and it resets the base if it gets an error on a patch. I think
> switching patch 5 and 6 order should fix things. Don't worry about
> that yet, I'll look at the rest of the series.
>

Ah OK, will re-order them. Thanks for the review.

--
Regards,
Sudeep
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml
index d07eb00b97c8..bfdc3e33565e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml
@@ -126,9 +126,15 @@  additionalProperties: false
             clock-names = "apb_pclk";
         };
 
-        mhu_client_scpi: scpi@2f000000 {
+        scpi {
             compatible = "arm,scpi";
-            reg = <0 0x2f000000 0 0x200>;
             mboxes = <&mhuB 1 4>; /* HP-NonSecure, 5th doorbell */
+            shmem = <&cpu_scp_hpri>; /* HP-NonSecure */
+
+            scpi_devpd: power-domains-0 {
+                compatible = "arm,scpi-power-domains";
+                num-domains = <2>;
+                #power-domain-cells = <1>;
+            };
         };
     };