diff mbox

[v2,4/6] regulator: pfuze100: add fsl, pmic_stby_poweroff property

Message ID 20170531061457.23744-5-o.rempel@pengutronix.de
State Changes Requested, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Oleksij Rempel May 31, 2017, 6:14 a.m. UTC
Document the new optional "fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff" property.

Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Mark Brown May 31, 2017, 2:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:14:55AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Document the new optional "fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff" property.

I'm missing both the cover letter and the rest of the series, what's
going on with dependencies here?
Oleksij Rempel May 31, 2017, 2:55 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:44:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:14:55AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Document the new optional "fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff" property.
> 
> I'm missing both the cover letter and the rest of the series, what's
> going on with dependencies here?

Hmm... I probably needed to add same list of maintainers to all patches.
I will fix it next time. The patches are here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/olerem/poweroff/

Should I resend it with complete Cc list?
Mark Rutland May 31, 2017, 2:56 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:14:55AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Document the new optional "fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff" property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt
> index 444c47831a40..216519c4a50d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt
> @@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ Required properties:
>  - compatible: "fsl,pfuze100", "fsl,pfuze200", "fsl,pfuze3000"
>  - reg: I2C slave address
>  
> +Optional properties:
> +- fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff: if present, configure the PMIC to shutdown all
> +  power rails when PMIC_STBY_REQ line is asserted during the power off sequence.

As with patch 1, s/_/-/ please.

Please also explain why/why this is needed.

Thanks,
Mark.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Mark Brown May 31, 2017, 3:56 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:55:36PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:44:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm missing both the cover letter and the rest of the series, what's
> > going on with dependencies here?

> Hmm... I probably needed to add same list of maintainers to all patches.
> I will fix it next time. The patches are here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/olerem/poweroff/

> Should I resend it with complete Cc list?

Like I say from my point of view I need to know what the dependencies
are somehow.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt
index 444c47831a40..216519c4a50d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pfuze100.txt
@@ -4,6 +4,10 @@  Required properties:
 - compatible: "fsl,pfuze100", "fsl,pfuze200", "fsl,pfuze3000"
 - reg: I2C slave address
 
+Optional properties:
+- fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff: if present, configure the PMIC to shutdown all
+  power rails when PMIC_STBY_REQ line is asserted during the power off sequence.
+
 Required child node:
 - regulators: This is the list of child nodes that specify the regulator
   initialization data for defined regulators. Please refer to below doc