diff mbox

[1/2] Documentation: Device Tree binding information for gpio-joy driver

Message ID 1423215122-19947-2-git-send-email-hans.holmberg@intel.com
State Needs Review / ACK, archived
Headers show

Checks

Context Check Description
robh/checkpatch warning total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 lines checked
robh/patch-applied success

Commit Message

Hans Holmberg Feb. 6, 2015, 9:32 a.m. UTC
This document describes the Device Tree bindings for the gpio-joy
driver.

Signed-off-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@intel.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt         | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt

Comments

Mark Rutland Feb. 6, 2015, 10:53 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:32:01AM +0000, Hans Holmberg wrote:
> This document describes the Device Tree bindings for the gpio-joy
> driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt         | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ef8ad09
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +Device-Tree bindings for input/joystick/gpio_joy.c joystick driver
> +
> +This driver can be used for connecting i.e. C64 and Atari joysticks.

The binding should be for a class of hardware, not for a driver. Please
describe the class of hardware the binding represents, and remove
references to the Linux driver.

> +Required properties:
> +	- compatible    = "gpio-joy";

That does not strike me as a very informative compatible string. At the
least, s/joy/joystick/.

> +
> +	- left-gpio     : gpio connected to the "left" joystick signal
> +	- right-gpio    : gpio connected to the "right" joystick signal
> +	- up-gpio       : gpio connected to the "up" joystick signal
> +	- down-gpio     : gpio connected to the "down" joystick signal
> +	- button-gpio   : gpio connected to the "button" joystick signal

Only one button?

Thanks,
Mark.

> +		See OF device-tree gpio specification.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +	- debounce-interval-ms: debounce interval in milliseconds for connected pins
> +		Default is 10 milliseconds
> +
> +Example node:
> +
> +joystick {
> +	compatible = "gpio-joy";
> +	left-gpio = <&gpio 24 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +	right-gpio = <&gpio 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +	up-gpio	= <&gpio 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +	down-gpio = <&gpio 27 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +	button-gpio = <&gpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +};
> +
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hans Holmberg Feb. 7, 2015, 7:50 a.m. UTC | #2
> The binding should be for a class of hardware, not for a driver. Please
> describe the class of hardware the binding represents, and remove
> references to the Linux driver.

Will do.

> 
> > +Required properties:
> > +	- compatible    = "gpio-joy";
> 
> That does not strike me as a very informative compatible string. At the least,
> s/joy/joystick/.

You're very right, gpio-joystick is better and as about as specific as it can be I believe.

> > +
> > +	- left-gpio     : gpio connected to the "left" joystick signal
> > +	- right-gpio    : gpio connected to the "right" joystick signal
> > +	- up-gpio       : gpio connected to the "up" joystick signal
> > +	- down-gpio     : gpio connected to the "down" joystick signal
> > +	- button-gpio   : gpio connected to the "button" joystick signal
> 
> Only one button?

Hmm, yes, but it would make more sense to have sub-nodes defining an arbitrary 
number of buttons instead, right?

Thanks for reviewing!
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ef8ad09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-joy.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ 
+Device-Tree bindings for input/joystick/gpio_joy.c joystick driver
+
+This driver can be used for connecting i.e. C64 and Atari joysticks.
+
+Required properties:
+	- compatible    = "gpio-joy";
+
+	- left-gpio     : gpio connected to the "left" joystick signal
+	- right-gpio    : gpio connected to the "right" joystick signal
+	- up-gpio       : gpio connected to the "up" joystick signal
+	- down-gpio     : gpio connected to the "down" joystick signal
+	- button-gpio   : gpio connected to the "button" joystick signal
+		See OF device-tree gpio specification.
+
+Optional properties:
+	- debounce-interval-ms: debounce interval in milliseconds for connected pins
+		Default is 10 milliseconds
+
+Example node:
+
+joystick {
+	compatible = "gpio-joy";
+	left-gpio = <&gpio 24 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	right-gpio = <&gpio 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	up-gpio	= <&gpio 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	down-gpio = <&gpio 27 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	button-gpio = <&gpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+};
+