mbox series

[v3,0/7] PCI: dwc: rcar-gen4: Add R-Car V4H support

Message ID 20240401023942.134704-1-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com
Headers show
Series PCI: dwc: rcar-gen4: Add R-Car V4H support | expand

Message

Yoshihiro Shimoda April 1, 2024, 2:39 a.m. UTC
The pcie-rcar-gen4 driver can reuse other R-Car Gen4 support like
r8a779g0 (R-Car V4H) and r8a779h0 (R-Car V4M). However, some
initializing settings differ between R-Car S4-8 (r8a779f0) and
others. The R-Car S4-8 will be minority about the setting way. So,
R-Car V4H will be majority and this is generic initialization way
as "renesas,rcar-gen4-pcie{-ep}" compatible. For now, I tested
both R-Car S4-8 and R-Car V4H on this driver. I'll support one more
other SoC (R-Car V4M) in the future.

Changes from v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240326024540.2336155-1-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com/
- Add a new patch which just add a platdata in patch 4/7.
- Modify the subjects in patch [56]/7.
- Modify the description and code about Bjorn's comment in patch [56]/7.
- Add missing MODULE_FIRMWARE(9 in patch 6/7.
- Document a policy aboud adding pci_device_id instead of adding r8a779g0's id
  in patch 7/7.

Changes from v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240229120719.2553638-1-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com/
- Based on v6.9-rc1.
- Add Acked-by and/or Reviewed-by in patch [126/6].

Yoshihiro Shimoda (7):
  dt-bindings: PCI: rcar-gen4-pci-host: Add R-Car V4H compatible
  dt-bindings: PCI: rcar-gen4-pci-ep: Add R-Car V4H compatible
  PCI: dwc: Add PCIE_PORT_{FORCE,LANE_SKEW} macros
  PCI: dwc: rcar-gen4: Add rcar_gen4_pcie_platdata
  PCI: dwc: rcar-gen4: Add .ltssm_enable() for other SoC support
  PCI: dwc: rcar-gen4: Add support for r8a779g0
  misc: pci_endpoint_test: Document a policy about adding pci_device_id

 .../bindings/pci/rcar-gen4-pci-ep.yaml        |   4 +-
 .../bindings/pci/rcar-gen4-pci-host.yaml      |   4 +-
 drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c              |   1 +
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h  |   6 +
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c   | 272 +++++++++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Geert Uytterhoeven April 2, 2024, 7:53 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Shimoda-san,

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:40 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote:
> This driver previously supported r8a779f0 (R-Car S4-8). Add support
> for r8a779g0 (R-Car V4H).
>
> To support r8a779g0, it requires specific firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c

> +static int rcar_gen4_pcie_update_phy_firmware(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar)
> +{
> +       const u32 check_addr[] = { 0x00101018, 0x00101118, 0x00101021, 0x00101121};
> +       struct dw_pcie *dw = &rcar->dw;
> +       const struct firmware *fw;
> +       unsigned int i, timeout;
> +       u32 data;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = request_firmware(&fw, RCAR_GEN4_PCIE_FIRMWARE_NAME, dw->dev);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_err(dw->dev, "%s: Requesting firmware failed\n", __func__);
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < (fw->size / 2); i++) {
> +               data = fw->data[i * 2] | fw->data[(i * 2) + 1] << 8;
> +               timeout = 100;
> +retry_data:
> +               dw_pcie_writel_dbi(dw, PRTLGC89, RCAR_GEN4_PCIE_FIRMWARE_BASE_ADDR + i);
> +               dw_pcie_writel_dbi(dw, PRTLGC90, data);
> +               if (rcar_gen4_pcie_reg_check_bit(rcar, PRTLGC89, BIT(30)) < 0) {

If you would invert the logic here, you could "break" here, ...

> +                       if (!(--timeout)) {
> +                               ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +                               goto exit;
> +                       }
> +                       usleep_range(100, 200);
> +                       goto retry_data;

... and convert "retry_data: ... goto retry_data" into "do { ... } while (1)",
avoiding the goto.

> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       rcar_gen4_pcie_phy_reg_update_bits(rcar, RCAR_GEN4_PCIE_PHY_0f8, BIT(17), BIT(17));
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(check_addr); i++) {
> +               timeout = 100;
> +retry_check:
> +               dw_pcie_writel_dbi(dw, PRTLGC89, check_addr[i]);
> +               ret = rcar_gen4_pcie_reg_check_bit(rcar, PRTLGC89, BIT(30));
> +               ret |= rcar_gen4_pcie_reg_check_bit(rcar, PRTLGC90, BIT(0));
> +               if (ret < 0) {
> +                       if (!(--timeout)) {
> +                               ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +                               goto exit;
> +                       }
> +                       usleep_range(100, 200);
> +                       goto retry_check;

Likewise.

> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       ret = 0;
> +exit:
> +       release_firmware(fw);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Yoshihiro Shimoda April 3, 2024, 12:03 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Geert-san,

> From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 4:53 PM
> 
> Hi Shimoda-san,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:40 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
> <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote:
> > This driver previously supported r8a779f0 (R-Car S4-8). Add support
> > for r8a779g0 (R-Car V4H).
> >
> > To support r8a779g0, it requires specific firmware.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!

Thank you for your review!

> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
> 
> > +static int rcar_gen4_pcie_update_phy_firmware(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar)
> > +{
> > +       const u32 check_addr[] = { 0x00101018, 0x00101118, 0x00101021, 0x00101121};
> > +       struct dw_pcie *dw = &rcar->dw;
> > +       const struct firmware *fw;
> > +       unsigned int i, timeout;
> > +       u32 data;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       ret = request_firmware(&fw, RCAR_GEN4_PCIE_FIRMWARE_NAME, dw->dev);
> > +       if (ret) {
> > +               dev_err(dw->dev, "%s: Requesting firmware failed\n", __func__);
> > +               return ret;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < (fw->size / 2); i++) {
> > +               data = fw->data[i * 2] | fw->data[(i * 2) + 1] << 8;
> > +               timeout = 100;
> > +retry_data:
> > +               dw_pcie_writel_dbi(dw, PRTLGC89, RCAR_GEN4_PCIE_FIRMWARE_BASE_ADDR + i);
> > +               dw_pcie_writel_dbi(dw, PRTLGC90, data);
> > +               if (rcar_gen4_pcie_reg_check_bit(rcar, PRTLGC89, BIT(30)) < 0) {
> 
> If you would invert the logic here, you could "break" here, ...
> 
> > +                       if (!(--timeout)) {
> > +                               ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +                               goto exit;
> > +                       }
> > +                       usleep_range(100, 200);
> > +                       goto retry_data;
> 
> ... and convert "retry_data: ... goto retry_data" into "do { ... } while (1)",
> avoiding the goto.

Thank you for your suggestion. I'll fix it.

> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       rcar_gen4_pcie_phy_reg_update_bits(rcar, RCAR_GEN4_PCIE_PHY_0f8, BIT(17), BIT(17));
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(check_addr); i++) {
> > +               timeout = 100;
> > +retry_check:
> > +               dw_pcie_writel_dbi(dw, PRTLGC89, check_addr[i]);
> > +               ret = rcar_gen4_pcie_reg_check_bit(rcar, PRTLGC89, BIT(30));
> > +               ret |= rcar_gen4_pcie_reg_check_bit(rcar, PRTLGC90, BIT(0));
> > +               if (ret < 0) {
> > +                       if (!(--timeout)) {
> > +                               ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +                               goto exit;
> > +                       }
> > +                       usleep_range(100, 200);
> > +                       goto retry_check;
> 
> Likewise.

I'll fix it.

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda

> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       ret = 0;
> > +exit:
> > +       release_firmware(fw);
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds