mbox series

[v2,0/4] Mediatek MT8192 scpsys support

Message ID 1603370857-30646-1-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com
Headers show
Series Mediatek MT8192 scpsys support | expand

Message

Weiyi Lu Oct. 22, 2020, 12:47 p.m. UTC
This series is based on v5.9-rc1, MT8192 clock v4[1] and
soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add new driver for SCPSYS power domains controller[2]

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=368799
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=358429

change since v1:
- add patch of default power off flag

Weiyi Lu (4):
  dt-bindings: power: Add MT8192 power domains
  soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add default power off flag
  soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add support for mt8192
  arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mt8192 power domains controller

 .../power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml      |   1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi      | 201 +++++++++++
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c         | 313 +++++++++++++++++-
 include/dt-bindings/power/mt8192-power.h      |  32 ++
 include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h         |  56 ++++
 5 files changed, 596 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/mt8192-power.h

Comments

Matthias Brugger Oct. 27, 2020, 10:25 a.m. UTC | #1
On 22/10/2020 14:47, Weiyi Lu wrote:
> For some power domain, like conn on MT8192, it should be default OFF.
> Because the power on/off control relies the function of connectivity chip
> and its firmware. And if project choose other chip vendor solution,
> those necessary connectivity functions will not provided.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> index b7ccf94..50a7ae1 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>   #define MTK_SCPD_ACTIVE_WAKEUP		BIT(0)
>   #define MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM		BIT(1)
>   #define MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO		BIT(2)
> +#define MTK_SCPD_KEEP_DEFAULT_OFF	BIT(3)
>   #define MTK_SCPD_CAPS(_scpd, _x)	((_scpd)->data->caps & (_x))
>   
>   #define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON			0x0210
> @@ -506,17 +507,26 @@ static int scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_node *node
>   	 * software.  The unused domains will be switched off during
>   	 * late_init time.
>   	 */
> -	ret = scpsys_power_on(&pd->genpd);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err_probe(scpsys->dev, ret, "failed to power on domain %pOFN\n", node);
> -		goto err_unprepare_clocks;
> +	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_KEEP_DEFAULT_OFF)) {
> +		if (scpsys_domain_is_on(pd))
> +			dev_warn(scpsys->dev,
> +				 "A default off power domain %pOFN has been ON\n", node);
> +	} else {
> +		ret = scpsys_power_on(&pd->genpd);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err_probe(scpsys->dev, ret, "failed to power on domain %pOFN\n", node);
> +			goto err_unprepare_clocks;
> +		}
>   	}
>   
>   	pd->genpd.name = node->name;
>   	pd->genpd.power_off = scpsys_power_off;
>   	pd->genpd.power_on = scpsys_power_on;
>   
> -	pm_genpd_init(&pd->genpd, NULL, false);
> +	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_KEEP_DEFAULT_OFF))
> +		pm_genpd_init(&pd->genpd, NULL, true);
> +	else
> +		pm_genpd_init(&pd->genpd, NULL, false);
>   
>   	scpsys->domains[id] = &pd->genpd;
>   	return 0;
> @@ -603,7 +613,8 @@ static void scpsys_remove_one_domain(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>   			"failed to remove domain '%s' : %d - state may be inconsistent\n",
>   			pd->genpd.name, ret);
>   
> -	scpsys_power_off(&pd->genpd);
> +	if (!MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_KEEP_DEFAULT_OFF))
> +		scpsys_power_off(&pd->genpd);

Is that really needed? Turning the domain off when it's already off shouldn't hurt.

Regards,
Matthias