cifs: fix spelling mistake, EACCESS -> EACCES

Message ID 20181026180721.5040-1-colin.king@canonical.com
State New
Headers show
Series
  • cifs: fix spelling mistake, EACCESS -> EACCES
Related show

Commit Message

Colin King Oct. 26, 2018, 6:07 p.m.
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Trivial fix to a spelling mistake of the error access name EACCESS,
rename to EACCES

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 fs/cifs/file.c  | 2 +-
 fs/cifs/inode.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Steve French Oct. 26, 2018, 6:50 p.m. | #1
merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 1:10 PM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Trivial fix to a spelling mistake of the error access name EACCESS,
> rename to EACCES
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/file.c  | 2 +-
>  fs/cifs/inode.c | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index 84477e995246..6894d071850a 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
>   * Set the byte-range lock (mandatory style). Returns:
>   * 1) 0, if we set the lock and don't need to request to the server;
>   * 2) 1, if no locks prevent us but we need to request to the server;
> - * 3) -EACCESS, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false.
> + * 3) -EACCES, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false.
>   */
>  static int
>  cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c
> index 0945d40030eb..3685e2c25205 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
> @@ -1305,8 +1305,8 @@ cifs_drop_nlink(struct inode *inode)
>  /*
>   * If d_inode(dentry) is null (usually meaning the cached dentry
>   * is a negative dentry) then we would attempt a standard SMB delete, but
> - * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCESS
> - * but will return the EACCESS to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call
> + * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCES
> + * but will return the EACCES to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call
>   * unlink on negative dentries currently.
>   */
>  int cifs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
> --
> 2.19.1
>

Patch

diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 84477e995246..6894d071850a 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@  cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
  * Set the byte-range lock (mandatory style). Returns:
  * 1) 0, if we set the lock and don't need to request to the server;
  * 2) 1, if no locks prevent us but we need to request to the server;
- * 3) -EACCESS, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false.
+ * 3) -EACCES, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false.
  */
 static int
 cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c
index 0945d40030eb..3685e2c25205 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
@@ -1305,8 +1305,8 @@  cifs_drop_nlink(struct inode *inode)
 /*
  * If d_inode(dentry) is null (usually meaning the cached dentry
  * is a negative dentry) then we would attempt a standard SMB delete, but
- * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCESS
- * but will return the EACCESS to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call
+ * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCES
+ * but will return the EACCES to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call
  * unlink on negative dentries currently.
  */
 int cifs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)