[PULL,5/7] vhost-user: Don't ask for reply on postcopy mem table set

Message ID 20181011192513.63634-6-dgilbert@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series
  • [PULL,1/7] tests: Add migration test for aarch64
Related show

Commit Message

Dr. David Alan Gilbert Oct. 11, 2018, 7:25 p.m.
From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>

According to documentation, NEED_REPLY_MASK should not be set
for VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE request in postcopy mode.
This restriction was mistakenly applied to 'reply_supported'
variable, which is local and used only for non-postcopy case.

CC: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Fixes: 9bb38019942c ("vhost+postcopy: Send address back to qemu")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
Message-Id: <20181002140947.4107-1-i.maximets@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
 hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 13 +------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
index ed47d645d9..e09bed0e4a 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
@@ -374,8 +374,6 @@  static int vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy(struct vhost_dev *dev,
     int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
     int i, fd;
     size_t fd_num = 0;
-    bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
-                                              VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK);
     VhostUserMsg msg_reply;
     int region_i, msg_i;
 
@@ -384,10 +382,6 @@  static int vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy(struct vhost_dev *dev,
         .hdr.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION,
     };
 
-    if (reply_supported) {
-        msg.hdr.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK;
-    }
-
     if (u->region_rb_len < dev->mem->nregions) {
         u->region_rb = g_renew(RAMBlock*, u->region_rb, dev->mem->nregions);
         u->region_rb_offset = g_renew(ram_addr_t, u->region_rb_offset,
@@ -503,10 +497,6 @@  static int vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy(struct vhost_dev *dev,
         return -1;
     }
 
-    if (reply_supported) {
-        return process_message_reply(dev, &msg);
-    }
-
     return 0;
 }
 
@@ -519,8 +509,7 @@  static int vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct vhost_dev *dev,
     size_t fd_num = 0;
     bool do_postcopy = u->postcopy_listen && u->postcopy_fd.handler;
     bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
-                                          VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK) &&
-                                          !do_postcopy;
+                                              VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK);
 
     if (do_postcopy) {
         /* Postcopy has enough differences that it's best done in it's own