Patchwork [GIT,PULL] Pull request for 2.6.40

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Sekhar Nori
Date May 24, 2011, 10:21 a.m.
Message ID <B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB593024D09B89A@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/97140/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://gitorious.org/linux-davinci/linux-davinci.git davinci-next

Comments

Sekhar Nori - May 24, 2011, 10:21 a.m.
Hi Russell,

I have been tracking these four patches for inclusion in 2.6.40
can you please pull them?

These are clean-up rather than consolidation patches and all
of them have zero or negative net diffstat.

Thanks,
Sekhar

The following changes since commit 0ee5623f9a6e52df90a78bd21179f8ab370e102e:
  Linus Torvalds (1):
        Linux 2.6.39-rc6

are available in the git repository at:

  git://gitorious.org/linux-davinci/linux-davinci.git davinci-next

Manjunath Hadli (1):
      davinci: move DM64XX_VDD3P3V_PWDN to devices.c

Sergei Shtylyov (3):
      DA8xx: kill duplicate #define DA8XX_GPIO_BASE
      DA8xx: kill duplicate #define DA8XX_PLL1_BASE
      DA8xx: move base address #define's to their proper place

 arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c                 |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c         |   16 +++++++++-------
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices.c               |    3 +++
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h    |    4 ----
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/hardware.h |    3 ---
 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Kevin Hilman - May 25, 2011, 9:07 p.m.
Hi Sekhar,

"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com> writes:

> Hi Russell,
>
> I have been tracking these four patches for inclusion in 2.6.40
> can you please pull them?
>
> These are clean-up rather than consolidation patches and all
> of them have zero or negative net diffstat.
>

The commits in this branch aren't quite right.   All except the last one
are missing your signoff.  As you're on the delivery path, be sure to
include your signoff on all the patches.

Thanks,

Kevin

>
> The following changes since commit 0ee5623f9a6e52df90a78bd21179f8ab370e102e:
>   Linus Torvalds (1):
>         Linux 2.6.39-rc6
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>   git://gitorious.org/linux-davinci/linux-davinci.git davinci-next
>
> Manjunath Hadli (1):
>       davinci: move DM64XX_VDD3P3V_PWDN to devices.c
>
> Sergei Shtylyov (3):
>       DA8xx: kill duplicate #define DA8XX_GPIO_BASE
>       DA8xx: kill duplicate #define DA8XX_PLL1_BASE
>       DA8xx: move base address #define's to their proper place
>
>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c                 |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c         |   16 +++++++++-------
>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices.c               |    3 +++
>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h    |    4 ----
>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/hardware.h |    3 ---
>  5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
> Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
> http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Sekhar Nori - May 26, 2011, 5:30 a.m.
Hi Kevin,

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:37:32, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
> Hi Sekhar,
> 
> "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > I have been tracking these four patches for inclusion in 2.6.40
> > can you please pull them?
> >
> > These are clean-up rather than consolidation patches and all
> > of them have zero or negative net diffstat.
> >
> 
> The commits in this branch aren't quite right.   All except the last one
> are missing your signoff.  As you're on the delivery path, be sure to
> include your signoff on all the patches.

Thanks for pointing out. I have fixed that now. The same branch
has been updated. Will take care next time on.

Unfortunately the commit times have been updated as well, so they
like recent commits now.

Regards,
Sekhar
Russell King - ARM Linux - May 26, 2011, 7:27 a.m.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:00:17AM +0530, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out. I have fixed that now. The same branch
> has been updated. Will take care next time on.
> 
> Unfortunately the commit times have been updated as well, so they
> like recent commits now.

And the other problem is I've already pulled it into my devel-stable
branch and pushed it out, so I'm not re-pulling it.