| Message ID | 20180904170930.28619-6-jsnow@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | jobs: Job Exit Refactoring Pt 2 | expand |
On 2018-09-04 19:09, John Snow wrote: > In cases where we abort the block/mirror job, there's no point in > installing the new backing chain before we finish aborting. > > Move this to the "success" portion of mirror_exit. Sounds a bit weird now that you don't do any moving. > Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> > --- > block/mirror.c | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c > index cba555b4ef..3365bcfdfb 100644 > --- a/block/mirror.c > +++ b/block/mirror.c > @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static void mirror_exit(Job *job) > * required before it could become a backing file of target_bs. */ > bdrv_child_try_set_perm(mirror_top_bs->backing, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL, > &error_abort); > - if (s->backing_mode == MIRROR_SOURCE_BACKING_CHAIN) { > + if (ret == 0 && s->backing_mode == MIRROR_SOURCE_BACKING_CHAIN) { > BlockDriverState *backing = s->is_none_mode ? src : s->base; > if (backing_bs(target_bs) != backing) { > bdrv_set_backing_hd(target_bs, backing, &local_err); > @@ -659,10 +659,7 @@ static void mirror_exit(Job *job) > } > > if (s->should_complete && ret == 0) { > - BlockDriverState *to_replace = src; > - if (s->to_replace) { > - to_replace = s->to_replace; > - } > + BlockDriverState *to_replace = s->to_replace ? s->to_replace : src; > > if (bdrv_get_flags(target_bs) != bdrv_get_flags(to_replace)) { > bdrv_reopen(target_bs, bdrv_get_flags(to_replace), NULL); And this hunk now looks out of place. Sure, it makes sense, but why is it in this patch now? :-) (Moving it into the next patch would make more sense, I think.) I'd like to give an R-b anyway, but I know that I shouldn't, so I won't. Max
On 09/05/2018 06:40 AM, Max Reitz wrote: > On 2018-09-04 19:09, John Snow wrote: >> In cases where we abort the block/mirror job, there's no point in >> installing the new backing chain before we finish aborting. >> >> Move this to the "success" portion of mirror_exit. > > Sounds a bit weird now that you don't do any moving. > I ought to proofread my commit messages when I make changes... >> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> >> --- >> block/mirror.c | 7 ++----- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c >> index cba555b4ef..3365bcfdfb 100644 >> --- a/block/mirror.c >> +++ b/block/mirror.c >> @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static void mirror_exit(Job *job) >> * required before it could become a backing file of target_bs. */ >> bdrv_child_try_set_perm(mirror_top_bs->backing, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL, >> &error_abort); >> - if (s->backing_mode == MIRROR_SOURCE_BACKING_CHAIN) { >> + if (ret == 0 && s->backing_mode == MIRROR_SOURCE_BACKING_CHAIN) { >> BlockDriverState *backing = s->is_none_mode ? src : s->base; >> if (backing_bs(target_bs) != backing) { >> bdrv_set_backing_hd(target_bs, backing, &local_err); >> @@ -659,10 +659,7 @@ static void mirror_exit(Job *job) >> } >> >> if (s->should_complete && ret == 0) { >> - BlockDriverState *to_replace = src; >> - if (s->to_replace) { >> - to_replace = s->to_replace; >> - } >> + BlockDriverState *to_replace = s->to_replace ? s->to_replace : src; >> >> if (bdrv_get_flags(target_bs) != bdrv_get_flags(to_replace)) { >> bdrv_reopen(target_bs, bdrv_get_flags(to_replace), NULL); > > And this hunk now looks out of place. Sure, it makes sense, but why is > it in this patch now? :-) > > (Moving it into the next patch would make more sense, I think.) > > I'd like to give an R-b anyway, but I know that I shouldn't, so I won't. > > Max > I have to admit that my appetite for patch purity is just... low. I know it's something we care a lot in the QEMU project, but after a number of years I'm just not overwhelmed to care about it in any significant capacity. I suppose the main argument for this practice is ease of backporting, yes? --js
On 2018-09-05 17:39, John Snow wrote: > > > On 09/05/2018 06:40 AM, Max Reitz wrote: >> On 2018-09-04 19:09, John Snow wrote: >>> In cases where we abort the block/mirror job, there's no point in >>> installing the new backing chain before we finish aborting. >>> >>> Move this to the "success" portion of mirror_exit. >> >> Sounds a bit weird now that you don't do any moving. >> > > I ought to proofread my commit messages when I make changes... > >>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> block/mirror.c | 7 ++----- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c >>> index cba555b4ef..3365bcfdfb 100644 >>> --- a/block/mirror.c >>> +++ b/block/mirror.c >>> @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static void mirror_exit(Job *job) >>> * required before it could become a backing file of target_bs. */ >>> bdrv_child_try_set_perm(mirror_top_bs->backing, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL, >>> &error_abort); >>> - if (s->backing_mode == MIRROR_SOURCE_BACKING_CHAIN) { >>> + if (ret == 0 && s->backing_mode == MIRROR_SOURCE_BACKING_CHAIN) { >>> BlockDriverState *backing = s->is_none_mode ? src : s->base; >>> if (backing_bs(target_bs) != backing) { >>> bdrv_set_backing_hd(target_bs, backing, &local_err); >>> @@ -659,10 +659,7 @@ static void mirror_exit(Job *job) >>> } >>> >>> if (s->should_complete && ret == 0) { >>> - BlockDriverState *to_replace = src; >>> - if (s->to_replace) { >>> - to_replace = s->to_replace; >>> - } >>> + BlockDriverState *to_replace = s->to_replace ? s->to_replace : src; >>> >>> if (bdrv_get_flags(target_bs) != bdrv_get_flags(to_replace)) { >>> bdrv_reopen(target_bs, bdrv_get_flags(to_replace), NULL); >> >> And this hunk now looks out of place. Sure, it makes sense, but why is >> it in this patch now? :-) >> >> (Moving it into the next patch would make more sense, I think.) >> >> I'd like to give an R-b anyway, but I know that I shouldn't, so I won't. >> >> Max >> > > I have to admit that my appetite for patch purity is just... low. I know > it's something we care a lot in the QEMU project, but after a number of > years I'm just not overwhelmed to care about it in any significant capacity. > > I suppose the main argument for this practice is ease of backporting, yes? I suppose. And ease of bisecting. And ease of reviewing. Max
diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c index cba555b4ef..3365bcfdfb 100644 --- a/block/mirror.c +++ b/block/mirror.c @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static void mirror_exit(Job *job) * required before it could become a backing file of target_bs. */ bdrv_child_try_set_perm(mirror_top_bs->backing, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL, &error_abort); - if (s->backing_mode == MIRROR_SOURCE_BACKING_CHAIN) { + if (ret == 0 && s->backing_mode == MIRROR_SOURCE_BACKING_CHAIN) { BlockDriverState *backing = s->is_none_mode ? src : s->base; if (backing_bs(target_bs) != backing) { bdrv_set_backing_hd(target_bs, backing, &local_err); @@ -659,10 +659,7 @@ static void mirror_exit(Job *job) } if (s->should_complete && ret == 0) { - BlockDriverState *to_replace = src; - if (s->to_replace) { - to_replace = s->to_replace; - } + BlockDriverState *to_replace = s->to_replace ? s->to_replace : src; if (bdrv_get_flags(target_bs) != bdrv_get_flags(to_replace)) { bdrv_reopen(target_bs, bdrv_get_flags(to_replace), NULL);
In cases where we abort the block/mirror job, there's no point in installing the new backing chain before we finish aborting. Move this to the "success" portion of mirror_exit. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> --- block/mirror.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)