From patchwork Wed May 11 17:45:57 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sekhar Nori X-Patchwork-Id: 95173 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming-imx@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-imx@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E5B1007D7 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 03:46:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QKDUN-0004dn-G4; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:46:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=canuck.infradead.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QKDUM-0002ky-NB; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:46:22 +0000 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QKDUI-0002ke-Dd for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:46:20 +0000 Received: from dbdp20.itg.ti.com ([172.24.170.38]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id p4BHk11l022269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 May 2011 12:46:03 -0500 Received: from dbde71.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dbdp20.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4BHjxlV009240; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:15:59 +0530 (IST) Received: from dbde02.ent.ti.com ([172.24.170.145]) by dbde71.ent.ti.com ([172.24.170.149]) with mapi; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:15:59 +0530 From: "Nori, Sekhar" To: Mark Brown , Russell King - ARM Linux Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:15:57 +0530 Subject: RE: genirq: Generic irq chip available in git Thread-Topic: genirq: Generic irq chip available in git Thread-Index: AcwNiMXLVy1I37bmQnuenBd54rNn8ACeQQtQ Message-ID: References: <20110427212542.GD17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110508082222.GA27807@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110508133530.GA13815@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110508140023.GK27807@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110508140344.GC15968@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20110508140344.GC15968@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20090807-BlameThorstenAndJenny ( TRE 0.7.6 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20110511_134618_594412_B4C07F45 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.65 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.26.152 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LAK X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+incoming-imx=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-imx-kernel.lists.patchwork.ozlabs.org Hi Russell, On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 19:33:45, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:00:23PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Would it not make sense to go ahead and apply all the patches that > > > maintainers already acked? I rather suspect many people had thought > > > that Thomas' future pushes of the code would also include the patches > > > that they'd already approved and haven't realised that they need to > > > manually push the patches to you. > > > Which involves me having to read through the entire thread yet again to > > figure out what state each patch is at, save them out, edit them to add > > each ack to relevant patches, copy the lot to another machine, and then > > apply them. > > > The workload there is on the wrong person. > > Yeah, I'd actually have expected Thomas to have done this when he pushed > the patches to you to be honest - certainly if I were one of the > relevant maintainers I'd have been surprised that the patches got > dropped. I have included Thomas's davinci platform update with the relevant acks in the following pull request. There was also a checkpatch error that I fixed up locally. Hope this helps. The following changes since commit cfefd21e693dca791bf9ecfc9dd3794facad533c: Thomas Gleixner (1): genirq: Add chip suspend and resume callbacks are available in the git repository at: git://gitorious.org/linux-davinci/linux-davinci.git irq-davinci Thomas Gleixner (1): arm: davinci: Use generic irq chip arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c | 93 +++++++++--------------------------------- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)