Message ID | 20180601082402.17192-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | a5db5060e0b2e27605df272224bfd470f644d8a5 |
Headers | show |
Series | powerpc/mm/hash: hard disable irq in the SLB insert path | expand |
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 08:24:02 UTC, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote: > When inserting SLB entries for EA above 512TB, we need to hard disable irq. > This will make sure we don't take a PMU interrupt that can possibly touch > user space address via a stack dump. To prevent this, we need to hard disable > the interrupt. > > Also add a comment explaining why we don't need context synchronizing isync > with slbmte. > > Fixes: f384796c4 ("powerpc/mm: Add support for handling > 512TB address in SLB miss") > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a5db5060e0b2e27605df272224bfd4 cheers
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c index 66577cc66dc9..27f5b81c372a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c @@ -352,6 +352,14 @@ static void insert_slb_entry(unsigned long vsid, unsigned long ea, /* * We are irq disabled, hence should be safe to access PACA. */ + VM_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()); + + /* + * We can't take a PMU exception in the following code, so hard + * disable interrupts. + */ + hard_irq_disable(); + index = get_paca()->stab_rr; /* @@ -369,6 +377,11 @@ static void insert_slb_entry(unsigned long vsid, unsigned long ea, ((unsigned long) ssize << SLB_VSID_SSIZE_SHIFT); esid_data = mk_esid_data(ea, ssize, index); + /* + * No need for an isync before or after this slbmte. The exception + * we enter with and the rfid we exit with are context synchronizing. + * Also we only handle user segments here. + */ asm volatile("slbmte %0, %1" : : "r" (vsid_data), "r" (esid_data) : "memory");
When inserting SLB entries for EA above 512TB, we need to hard disable irq. This will make sure we don't take a PMU interrupt that can possibly touch user space address via a stack dump. To prevent this, we need to hard disable the interrupt. Also add a comment explaining why we don't need context synchronizing isync with slbmte. Fixes: f384796c4 ("powerpc/mm: Add support for handling > 512TB address in SLB miss") Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)