[v4,1/2] ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()

From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

Instead of setting the DMA ops pointer to NULL, set the correct,
non-IOMMU ops depending on the device's coherency setting.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- new patch to fix existing arm_iommu_detach_device() to do what we need

 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

On 30/05/18 15:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> Instead of setting the DMA ops pointer to NULL, set the correct,
> non-IOMMU ops depending on the device's coherency setting.

It looks like it's probably been 4 or 5 years since that became subtly 
wrong by virtue of the landscape changing around it, but it's clearly 
not enough of a problem to consider stable backports :)

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - new patch to fix existing arm_iommu_detach_device() to do what we need
> 
>   arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 12 ++++++------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index af27f1c22d93..87a0037574e4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -1151,6 +1151,11 @@ int arm_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>   	return __dma_supported(dev, mask, false);
>   }
>   
> +static const struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_dma_map_ops(bool coherent)
> +{
> +	return coherent ? &arm_coherent_dma_ops : &arm_dma_ops;
> +}
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU
>   
>   static int __dma_info_to_prot(enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> @@ -2296,7 +2301,7 @@ void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
>   	iommu_detach_device(mapping->domain, dev);
>   	kref_put(&mapping->kref, release_iommu_mapping);
>   	to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev) = NULL;
> -	set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
> +	set_dma_ops(dev, arm_get_dma_map_ops(dev->archdata.dma_coherent));
>   
>   	pr_debug("Detached IOMMU controller from %s device.\n", dev_name(dev));
>   }
> @@ -2357,11 +2362,6 @@ static void arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(struct device *dev) { }
>   
>   #endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU */
>   
> -static const struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_dma_map_ops(bool coherent)
> -{
> -	return coherent ? &arm_coherent_dma_ops : &arm_dma_ops;
> -}
> -
>   void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
>   			const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent)
>   {
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:06:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> Instead of setting the DMA ops pointer to NULL, set the correct,
> non-IOMMU ops depending on the device's coherency setting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - new patch to fix existing arm_iommu_detach_device() to do what we need
> 
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Christoph, Russell,

could either of you provide an Acked-by for this? I think it makes the
most sense for Ben to pick this up into the Nouveau tree along with
patch 2/2.

Thierry

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index af27f1c22d93..87a0037574e4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -1151,6 +1151,11 @@ int arm_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>  	return __dma_supported(dev, mask, false);
>  }
>  
> +static const struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_dma_map_ops(bool coherent)
> +{
> +	return coherent ? &arm_coherent_dma_ops : &arm_dma_ops;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU
>  
>  static int __dma_info_to_prot(enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> @@ -2296,7 +2301,7 @@ void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
>  	iommu_detach_device(mapping->domain, dev);
>  	kref_put(&mapping->kref, release_iommu_mapping);
>  	to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev) = NULL;
> -	set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
> +	set_dma_ops(dev, arm_get_dma_map_ops(dev->archdata.dma_coherent));
>  
>  	pr_debug("Detached IOMMU controller from %s device.\n", dev_name(dev));
>  }
> @@ -2357,11 +2362,6 @@ static void arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(struct device *dev) { }
>  
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU */
>  
> -static const struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_dma_map_ops(bool coherent)
> -{
> -	return coherent ? &arm_coherent_dma_ops : &arm_dma_ops;
> -}
> -
>  void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
>  			const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.17.0
>

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:53:17PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:06:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > Instead of setting the DMA ops pointer to NULL, set the correct,
> > non-IOMMU ops depending on the device's coherency setting.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - new patch to fix existing arm_iommu_detach_device() to do what we need
> > 
> >  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Christoph, Russell,
> 
> could either of you provide an Acked-by for this? I think it makes the
> most sense for Ben to pick this up into the Nouveau tree along with
> patch 2/2.

Looks fine to me.

Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

Thanks.

> 
> Thierry
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > index af27f1c22d93..87a0037574e4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > @@ -1151,6 +1151,11 @@ int arm_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> >  	return __dma_supported(dev, mask, false);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static const struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_dma_map_ops(bool coherent)
> > +{
> > +	return coherent ? &arm_coherent_dma_ops : &arm_dma_ops;
> > +}
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU
> >  
> >  static int __dma_info_to_prot(enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> > @@ -2296,7 +2301,7 @@ void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
> >  	iommu_detach_device(mapping->domain, dev);
> >  	kref_put(&mapping->kref, release_iommu_mapping);
> >  	to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev) = NULL;
> > -	set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
> > +	set_dma_ops(dev, arm_get_dma_map_ops(dev->archdata.dma_coherent));
> >  
> >  	pr_debug("Detached IOMMU controller from %s device.\n", dev_name(dev));
> >  }
> > @@ -2357,11 +2362,6 @@ static void arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(struct device *dev) { }
> >  
> >  #endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU */
> >  
> > -static const struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_dma_map_ops(bool coherent)
> > -{
> > -	return coherent ? &arm_coherent_dma_ops : &arm_dma_ops;
> > -}
> > -
> >  void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
> >  			const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent)
> >  {
> > -- 
> > 2.17.0
> >

Looks good:

Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html