Patchwork passes.texi: fill crossref nodes (GCC Internals)

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Gerald Pfeifer
Date April 18, 2011, 9:28 p.m.
Message ID <alpine.LNX.2.00.1104180002570.6474@gerinyyl.fvgr>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/91870/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Gerald Pfeifer - April 18, 2011, 9:28 p.m.
Hi there,

On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, crquan@gmail.com wrote:
> From: "Dennis, CHENG Renquan" <crquan@fedoraproject.org>
> 
> Tested with "make info pdf".

it seems your patch fell through the cracks.  Sorry about that!

I have now reviewed it, adjusted the ChangeLog entry, and committed
it to the current development head as well as the GCC 4.6 branch after
build tests there, too.

If you have further patches, please let us know!  And do not hesitate
to ping a patch if you are not seeing any response within a week.

Gerald


2011-04-17  Dennis, CHENG Renquan  <crquan@fedoraproject.org>

	* doc/passes.texi: Fill crossref nodes.

Patch

Index: doc/passes.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/passes.texi	(revision 172618)
+++ doc/passes.texi	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-@c markers: CROSSREF BUG TODO
+@c markers: BUG TODO
 
 @c Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
 @c 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ 
 The language front end is invoked only once, via
 @code{lang_hooks.parse_file}, to parse the entire input.  The language
 front end may use any intermediate language representation deemed
-appropriate.  The C front end uses GENERIC trees (CROSSREF), plus
+appropriate.  The C front end uses GENERIC trees (@pxref{GENERIC}), plus
 a double handful of language specific tree codes defined in
 @file{c-common.def}.  The Fortran front end uses a completely different
 private representation.
@@ -46,10 +46,9 @@ 
 At some point the front end must translate the representation used in the
 front end to a representation understood by the language-independent
 portions of the compiler.  Current practice takes one of two forms.
-The C front end manually invokes the gimplifier (CROSSREF) on each function,
+The C front end manually invokes the gimplifier (@pxref{GIMPLE}) on each function,
 and uses the gimplifier callbacks to convert the language-specific tree
-nodes directly to GIMPLE (CROSSREF) before passing the function off to
-be compiled.
+nodes directly to GIMPLE before passing the function off to be compiled.
 The Fortran front end converts from a private representation to GENERIC,
 which is later lowered to GIMPLE when the function is compiled.  Which
 route to choose probably depends on how well GENERIC (plus extensions)
@@ -111,11 +110,10 @@ 
 @cindex GIMPLE
 @dfn{Gimplification} is a whimsical term for the process of converting
 the intermediate representation of a function into the GIMPLE language
-(CROSSREF).  The term stuck, and so words like ``gimplification'',
+(@pxref{GIMPLE}).  The term stuck, and so words like ``gimplification'',
 ``gimplify'', ``gimplifier'' and the like are sprinkled throughout this
 section of code.
 
-@cindex GENERIC
 While a front end may certainly choose to generate GIMPLE directly if
 it chooses, this can be a moderately complex process unless the
 intermediate language used by the front end is already fairly simple.