ltp-testsuite: add --with-open-posix-testsuite

The issues mentioned on the removed comments were resolved,
tested in QEMU x86_64 and aarch64.

Signed-off-by: Ciro Santilli <ciro.santilli@gmail.com>
---
This patch supposes that the removed comments imply that a default
--with-open-posix-testsuite
is desirable (and I confirm that it does not take unreasoble build
time or disk space),
and that there is no generic way to add autotools configs to packages:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44341188/how-to-pass-extra-custom-configure-autotools-options-to-a-buildroot-package

 package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

 LTP_TESTSUITE_DEPENDENCIES += linux

Hi Ciro,

> Ah, learned about get-developers now :-)
Thanks for tip :)


> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ciro Santilli <ciro.santilli@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, May 3, 2018 at 5:03 PM
> Subject: [PATCH] ltp-testsuite: add --with-open-posix-testsuite
> To: buildroot@busybox.net


> The issues mentioned on the removed comments were resolved,
> tested in QEMU x86_64 and aarch64.
Yes, I've been thinking about reenabling it again last week for the same reason :-).
Thank you for your patch.

> Signed-off-by: Ciro Santilli <ciro.santilli@gmail.com>
> ---
> This patch supposes that the removed comments imply that a default
> --with-open-posix-testsuite
> is desirable (and I confirm that it does not take unreasoble build
> time or disk space),
> and that there is no generic way to add autotools configs to packages:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44341188/how-to-pass-extra-custom-configure-autotools-options-to-a-buildroot-package

>  package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk | 11 +----------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk
> b/package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk
> index c47f587836..4584ca45da 100644
> --- a/package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk
> +++ b/package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk
> @@ -9,17 +9,8 @@ LTP_TESTSUITE_SOURCE = ltp-full-$(LTP_TESTSUITE_VERSION).tar.xz
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_SITE =
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/releases/download/$(LTP_TESTSUITE_VERSION)
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_LICENSE = GPL-2.0, GPL-2.0+
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
> -
> -# Do not enable Open POSIX testsuite as it doesn't cross-compile
> -# properly: t0 program is built for the host machine. Notice that due
> -# to a bug, --without-open-posix-testsuite actually enables the test
> -# suite.
> -# See https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/143 (invalid
> -# autoconf test) and
> -# https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/144 (Open POSIX
> -# testsuite not cross-compiling).
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_CONF_OPTS += \
> - --with-realtime-testsuite
> + --with-realtime-testsuite --with-open-posix-testsuite

>  ifeq ($(BR2_LINUX_KERNEL),y)
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_DEPENDENCIES += linux

Acked-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>


Kind regards,
Petr

Hello Ciro,

On Thu, 3 May 2018 17:03:16 +0100, Ciro Santilli wrote:
> The issues mentioned on the removed comments were resolved,
> tested in QEMU x86_64 and aarch64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ciro Santilli <ciro.santilli@gmail.com>
> ---
> This patch supposes that the removed comments imply that a default
> --with-open-posix-testsuite
> is desirable (and I confirm that it does not take unreasoble build
> time or disk space),
> and that there is no generic way to add autotools configs to packages:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44341188/how-to-pass-extra-custom-configure-autotools-options-to-a-buildroot-package

Thanks for this contribution. However, your patch was corrupted, so it
would be nice to use "git send-email" next time to submit a patch.

However, since the patch was simple, I fixed it up, and applied. Thanks
again!

Thomas

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:55 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Hello Ciro,
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2018 17:03:16 +0100, Ciro Santilli wrote:
>> The issues mentioned on the removed comments were resolved,
>> tested in QEMU x86_64 and aarch64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ciro Santilli <ciro.santilli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> This patch supposes that the removed comments imply that a default
>> --with-open-posix-testsuite
>> is desirable (and I confirm that it does not take unreasoble build
>> time or disk space),
>> and that there is no generic way to add autotools configs to packages:
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44341188/how-to-pass-extra-custom-configure-autotools-options-to-a-buildroot-package
>
> Thanks for this contribution. However, your patch was corrupted, so it
> would be nice to use "git send-email" next time to submit a patch.
>

Ah, sorry about that.

git send-email didn't work on the network I was on, but it works on my
home network with the exact same git configs.

The problem is described at:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28038662/unable-to-initialize-smtp-properly-using-git
but none of the answers helped :-(

I wonder if anyone has ever solved it.

> However, since the patch was simple, I fixed it up, and applied. Thanks
> again!
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

On 03-05-18 18:03, Ciro Santilli wrote:
> The issues mentioned on the removed comments were resolved,
> tested in QEMU x86_64 and aarch64.

 Would be good to refer to the upstream commit that fixes it:
ca9561c124408ed0f5ed92c9ac7e092de05b5aed.


> Signed-off-by: Ciro Santilli <ciro.santilli@gmail.com>
> ---
> This patch supposes that the removed comments imply that a default
> --with-open-posix-testsuite
> is desirable (and I confirm that it does not take unreasoble build
> time or disk space),

 Indeed, no reason not to enable it.

Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>

 Regards,
 Arnout

> and that there is no generic way to add autotools configs to packages:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44341188/how-to-pass-extra-custom-configure-autotools-options-to-a-buildroot-package
> 
>  package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk | 11 +----------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk
> b/package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk
> index c47f587836..4584ca45da 100644
> --- a/package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk
> +++ b/package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk
> @@ -9,17 +9,8 @@ LTP_TESTSUITE_SOURCE = ltp-full-$(LTP_TESTSUITE_VERSION).tar.xz
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_SITE =
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/releases/download/$(LTP_TESTSUITE_VERSION)
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_LICENSE = GPL-2.0, GPL-2.0+
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
> -
> -# Do not enable Open POSIX testsuite as it doesn't cross-compile
> -# properly: t0 program is built for the host machine. Notice that due
> -# to a bug, --without-open-posix-testsuite actually enables the test
> -# suite.
> -# See https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/143 (invalid
> -# autoconf test) and
> -# https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/144 (Open POSIX
> -# testsuite not cross-compiling).
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_CONF_OPTS += \
> - --with-realtime-testsuite
> + --with-realtime-testsuite --with-open-posix-testsuite
> 
>  ifeq ($(BR2_LINUX_KERNEL),y)
>  LTP_TESTSUITE_DEPENDENCIES += linux
>