From patchwork Mon Apr 11 09:13:02 2011
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: UBI FAQ: add "why a dynamic volume is faster to access than a
static..." chapter.
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 23:13:02 -0000
From: Bastian Ruppert
X-Patchwork-Id: 90575
Message-Id: <1302513182-3960-1-git-send-email-Bastian.Ruppert@Sewerin.de>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Bastian Ruppert
Signed-off-by: Bastian Ruppert
---
faq/ubi.xml | 9 +++++++++
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/faq/ubi.xml b/faq/ubi.xml
index 48629ea..4a4b3bd 100644
--- a/faq/ubi.xml
+++ b/faq/ubi.xml
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
How do I implement UBI flasher?
What does the "ubi_bgt0d" thread do?
How do I speed up UBI initialization
+ Why a dynamic volume is faster to access than a static volume of the
+same size?
How do I debug UBI?
@@ -704,6 +706,13 @@ can do about it but without re-designing. Here are some ideas
here. Indeed, it is easier to solve one problem at a time.
+
+
+
+A static UBI volume is designed to store short blobs of data like a
+configuration file. UBI holds a CRC of the hole static volume, so it
+needs more time to mount a static volume than a dynamic one.