| Submitter | Pavel Herrmann |
|---|---|
| Date | April 7, 2011, 5:08 p.m. |
| Message ID | <201104071908.10852.morpheus.ibis@gmail.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/90211/ |
| State | Not Applicable |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:08:10PM +0200, Pavel Herrmann wrote: > + } else if (vendor == 0x1095 && devid == 0x4726) { > + /* chip found in Thermaltake BlackX Duet */ > + ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) { > + /* Use same quirks as sil chips to make it work */ > + link->flags |= ATA_LFLAG_NO_LPM | > + ATA_LFLAG_NO_SRST | > + ATA_LFLAG_ASSUME_ATA; > + } I'm confused. Against which version is the patch generated? Upstream already has quirks for 4726. Thakns.
On Thursday 07 of April 2011 21:03:00 Tejun Heo wrote: > I'm confused. Against which version is the patch generated? Upstream > already has quirks for 4726. > > Thakns. this is what you get from running and editing a different tree (and being lazy), sorry for messing it up. the correct (tested) code, without beautifications/comments: } else if (vendor == 0x197b && devid == 0x2352) { ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) { link->flags |= ATA_LFLAG_NO_LPM | ATA_LFLAG_NO_SRST | ATA_LFLAG_ASSUME_ATA; } } third time's the charm Thanks Pavel Herrmann PS: just to be on the safe side, this is the device detection from dmesg ata8.15: Port Multiplier 1.1, 0x197b:0x2352 r0, 2 ports, feat 0x0/0x0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 04/07/2011 03:40 PM, Pavel Herrmann wrote: > On Thursday 07 of April 2011 21:03:00 Tejun Heo wrote: >> I'm confused. Against which version is the patch generated? Upstream >> already has quirks for 4726. >> >> Thakns. > > this is what you get from running and editing a different tree (and being > lazy), sorry for messing it up. > > the correct (tested) code, without beautifications/comments: > > } else if (vendor == 0x197b&& devid == 0x2352) { > ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) { > link->flags |= ATA_LFLAG_NO_LPM | > ATA_LFLAG_NO_SRST | > ATA_LFLAG_ASSUME_ATA; > } > } > > third time's the charm > > Thanks > Pavel Herrmann > > PS: just to be on the safe side, this is the device detection from dmesg > ata8.15: Port Multiplier 1.1, 0x197b:0x2352 r0, 2 ports, feat 0x0/0x0 So you're gonna resend this as a real patch, right? :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Patch
From 55617331f5d1ef24f7fb60f9640a2363e3649cdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:15:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] libata-pmp: add support for Thermaltake BlackX Duet esata drive dock some errors still show up, but the dock works, both drives can be accessed at the same time the chip maker and designation is unknown - possibly jmicron JMB350? Signed-off-by: Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com> --- drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c b/drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c index 3120596..abc8474 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c @@ -449,6 +449,14 @@ static void sata_pmp_quirks(struct ata_port *ap) * otherwise. Don't try hard to recover it. */ ap->pmp_link[ap->nr_pmp_links - 1].flags |= ATA_LFLAG_NO_RETRY; + } else if (vendor == 0x1095 && devid == 0x4726) { + /* chip found in Thermaltake BlackX Duet */ + ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) { + /* Use same quirks as sil chips to make it work */ + link->flags |= ATA_LFLAG_NO_LPM | + ATA_LFLAG_NO_SRST | + ATA_LFLAG_ASSUME_ATA; + } } } -- 1.7.4.1