typo in gcc manual

Submitted by Jonathan Wakely on April 6, 2011, 8 a.m.

Details

Message ID BANLkTi=i=7BRLSuBMY4P2Cyn41Cvo8Zp9A@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Jonathan Wakely April 6, 2011, 8 a.m.
On 6 April 2011 04:15, ali hagigat wrote:
> 3.15 Specifying subprocesses and the switches to pass to them
> *[spec_name]:
> If this results in an empty string then the spec will be deleted. (Or,
> if the spec did not exist, then nothing will happened.)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> happened should be replaced with "happen" or with "be happned" I think.
>

Thanks, fixed by this patch, committed to trunk as obvious


2011-04-06  Jonathan Wakely  <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>

        * doc/invoke.texi (Spec Files): Fix typo.

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

Index: doc/invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/invoke.texi	(revision 172019)
+++ doc/invoke.texi	(working copy)
@@ -9391,7 +9391,7 @@  This tells the compiler to create, overr
 string.  All lines after this directive up to the next directive or
 blank line are considered to be the text for the spec string.  If this
 results in an empty string then the spec will be deleted.  (Or, if the
-spec did not exist, then nothing will happened.)  Otherwise, if the spec
+spec did not exist, then nothing will happen.)  Otherwise, if the spec
 does not currently exist a new spec will be created.  If the spec does
 exist then its contents will be overridden by the text of this
 directive, unless the first character of that text is the @samp{+}