[v2,2/2] vfio-ccw: introduce vfio_ccw_get_device()

A recent patch fixed leaks of the dynamically allocated vcdev->vdev.name
field in vfio_ccw_realize(), but we now have three freeing sites for it.
This is unfortunate and seems to indicate something is wrong with its
life cycle.

The root issue is that vcdev->vdev.name is set before vfio_get_device()
is called, which theoretically prevents to call vfio_put_device() to
do the freeing. Well actually, we could call it anyway  because
vfio_put_base_device() is a nop if the device isn't attached, but this
would be confusing.

This patch hence moves all the logic of attaching the device, including
the "already attached" check, to a separate vfio_ccw_get_device() function,
counterpart of vfio_put_device(). While here, vfio_put_device() is renamed
to vfio_ccw_put_device() for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
---
 hw/vfio/ccw.c |   56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 16:44:01 +0200
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:

> A recent patch fixed leaks of the dynamically allocated vcdev->vdev.name
> field in vfio_ccw_realize(), but we now have three freeing sites for it.
> This is unfortunate and seems to indicate something is wrong with its
> life cycle.
> 
> The root issue is that vcdev->vdev.name is set before vfio_get_device()
> is called, which theoretically prevents to call vfio_put_device() to
> do the freeing. Well actually, we could call it anyway  because
> vfio_put_base_device() is a nop if the device isn't attached, but this
> would be confusing.
> 
> This patch hence moves all the logic of attaching the device, including
> the "already attached" check, to a separate vfio_ccw_get_device() function,
> counterpart of vfio_put_device(). While here, vfio_put_device() is renamed
> to vfio_ccw_put_device() for consistency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> ---
>  hw/vfio/ccw.c |   56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> index fe34b507699f..49ae986d288d 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> @@ -292,12 +292,44 @@ static void vfio_ccw_put_region(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev)
>      g_free(vcdev->io_region);
>  }
>  
> -static void vfio_put_device(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev)
> +static void vfio_ccw_put_device(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev)
>  {
>      g_free(vcdev->vdev.name);
>      vfio_put_base_device(&vcdev->vdev);
>  }
>  
> +static int vfio_ccw_get_device(VFIOGroup *group, VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev,
> +                               Error **errp)

Make this one void, as you already pass an error object?

> +{
> +    char *name = g_strdup_printf("%x.%x.%04x", vcdev->cdev.hostid.cssid,
> +                                 vcdev->cdev.hostid.ssid,
> +                                 vcdev->cdev.hostid.devid);
> +    VFIODevice *vbasedev;
> +
> +    QLIST_FOREACH(vbasedev, &group->device_list, next) {
> +        if (strcmp(vbasedev->name, name) == 0) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "vfio: subchannel %s has already been attached",
> +                       name);
> +            goto out_err;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vfio_get_device(group, vcdev->cdev.mdevid, &vcdev->vdev, errp)) {
> +        goto out_err;
> +    }
> +
> +    vcdev->vdev.ops = &vfio_ccw_ops;
> +    vcdev->vdev.type = VFIO_DEVICE_TYPE_CCW;
> +    vcdev->vdev.name = name;
> +    vcdev->vdev.dev = &vcdev->cdev.parent_obj.parent_obj;
> +
> +    return 0;
> +
> +out_err:
> +    g_free(name);
> +    return -1;

That -1 return code looks artificial, so I really think this should be
void :) The only caller already defines a local error object anyway, so
it can just check for err.

> +}
> +
>  static VFIOGroup *vfio_ccw_get_group(S390CCWDevice *cdev, Error **errp)
>  {
>      char *tmp, group_path[PATH_MAX];