| Message ID | 1520997599-17298-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/7] i40e/i40evf: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs | expand |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote: > Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a barrier > on some architectures like arm64. > > This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the > register write. > > Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to > writel_relaxed(). > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c > index e554aa6cf..7028516 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c > @@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ static inline void i40e_release_rx_desc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, u32 val) > * such as IA-64). > */ > wmb(); > - writel(val, rx_ring->tail); > + writel_relaxed(val, rx_ring->tail); > } > > /** > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c > index 357d605..2d323fc 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c > @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static inline void i40e_release_rx_desc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, u32 val) > * such as IA-64). > */ > wmb(); > - writel(val, rx_ring->tail); > + writel_relaxed(val, rx_ring->tail); > } > So this one missed writel calls in: i40e: i40e_program_fdir_filter i40e_clean_rx_irq i40e_tx_map i40evf: i40e_clean_rx_irq i40e_tx_map
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c index e554aa6cf..7028516 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c @@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ static inline void i40e_release_rx_desc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, u32 val) * such as IA-64). */ wmb(); - writel(val, rx_ring->tail); + writel_relaxed(val, rx_ring->tail); } /** diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c index 357d605..2d323fc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static inline void i40e_release_rx_desc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, u32 val) * such as IA-64). */ wmb(); - writel(val, rx_ring->tail); + writel_relaxed(val, rx_ring->tail); } /**
Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64. This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the register write. Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to writel_relaxed(). Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)