[GIT,PULL] ARM: at91: SoC for 4.17
mbox series

Message ID 20180310052007.GA5536@piout.net
State New
Headers show
Series
  • [GIT,PULL] ARM: at91: SoC for 4.17
Related show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git tags/at91-ab-4.17-soc

Message

Alexandre Belloni March 10, 2018, 5:20 a.m. UTC
Arnd, Olof,

It has been two years that Atmel merge with Microchip, rename where
relevant.

This is based on my fixes PR which is already in next/soc. Tell me if
this is not right.

The following changes since commit c8d5dcf122b194e897d2a6311903eae0c1023325:

  MAINTAINERS: ARM: at91: update my email address (2018-02-22 16:22:15 +0100)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git tags/at91-ab-4.17-soc

for you to fetch changes up to ed08b63c8b3e23dfc8a32f0b450a23a35a3d91b4:

  ARM: at91: Kconfig: Update company to Microchip (2018-02-28 16:21:51 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
AT91 SoC for 4.17:

 - Rename Atmel to Microhip in MAINTAINERS, Documentation and Kconfig

----------------------------------------------------------------
Nicolas Ferre (3):
      MAINTAINERS: ARM: at91: update entry for ARM/Microchip
      Documentation: at91: Update Microchip SoC documentation
      ARM: at91: Kconfig: Update company to Microchip

 Documentation/arm/{Atmel => Microchip}/README | 52 +++++++++++++--------------
 MAINTAINERS                                   | 42 +++++++++++-----------
 arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig                    | 14 ++++----
 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
 rename Documentation/arm/{Atmel => Microchip}/README (64%)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann March 12, 2018, 2:26 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 6:20 AM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Arnd, Olof,
>
> It has been two years that Atmel merge with Microchip, rename where
> relevant.

Let's hope they don't rename themselves again next month after merging
with Microsemi then ;-)

> This is based on my fixes PR which is already in next/soc. Tell me if
> this is not right.

That's all good, thanks!

      Arnd