@@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static void __inet_del_ifa(struct in_dev
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&inetaddr_chain, NETDEV_DOWN, ifa1);
if (promote) {
+ struct in_ifaddr *next_sec = promote->ifa_next;
if (prev_prom) {
prev_prom->ifa_next = promote->ifa_next;
@@ -386,7 +387,7 @@ static void __inet_del_ifa(struct in_dev
rtmsg_ifa(RTM_NEWADDR, promote, nlh, pid);
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&inetaddr_chain,
NETDEV_UP, promote);
- for (ifa = promote->ifa_next; ifa; ifa = ifa->ifa_next) {
+ for (ifa = next_sec; ifa; ifa = ifa->ifa_next) {
if (ifa1->ifa_mask != ifa->ifa_mask ||
!inet_ifa_match(ifa1->ifa_address, ifa))
continue;
Optimize the calling of fib_add_ifaddr for all secondary addresses after the promoted one to start from their place, not from the new place of the promoted secondary. It will save some CPU cycles because we are sure the promoted secondary was first for the subnet and all next secondaries do not change their place. Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> --- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html