@@ -1305,6 +1305,22 @@ static int get_filter(const char *arg)
return 0;
}
+static int ifa_label_match_rta(int ifindex, const struct rtattr *rta)
+{
+ const char *label;
+ SPRINT_BUF(b1);
+
+ if (!filter.label)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (rta)
+ label = RTA_DATA(rta);
+ else
+ label = ll_idx_n2a(ifindex, b1);
+
+ return fnmatch(filter.label, label, 0);
+}
+
int print_addrinfo(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n,
void *arg)
{
@@ -1343,21 +1359,13 @@ int print_addrinfo(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n,
return 0;
if ((filter.flags ^ ifa_flags) & filter.flagmask)
return 0;
- if (filter.label) {
- SPRINT_BUF(b1);
- const char *label;
-
- if (rta_tb[IFA_LABEL])
- label = RTA_DATA(rta_tb[IFA_LABEL]);
- else
- label = ll_idx_n2a(ifa->ifa_index, b1);
- if (fnmatch(filter.label, label, 0) != 0)
- return 0;
- }
if (filter.family && filter.family != ifa->ifa_family)
return 0;
+ if (ifa_label_match_rta(ifa->ifa_index, rta_tb[IFA_LABEL]))
+ return 0;
+
if (inet_addr_match_rta(&filter.pfx, rta_tb[IFA_LOCAL]))
return 0;
@@ -1713,25 +1721,14 @@ static void ipaddr_filter(struct nlmsg_chain *linfo, struct nlmsg_chain *ainfo)
if ((filter.flags ^ ifa_flags) & filter.flagmask)
continue;
- if (filter.pfx.family || filter.label) {
- struct rtattr *rta =
- tb[IFA_LOCAL] ? : tb[IFA_ADDRESS];
-
- if (inet_addr_match_rta(&filter.pfx, rta))
- continue;
-
- if (filter.label) {
- SPRINT_BUF(b1);
- const char *label;
-
- if (tb[IFA_LABEL])
- label = RTA_DATA(tb[IFA_LABEL]);
- else
- label = ll_idx_n2a(ifa->ifa_index, b1);
- if (fnmatch(filter.label, label, 0) != 0)
- continue;
- }
- }
+
+ if (ifa_label_match_rta(ifa->ifa_index, tb[IFA_LABEL]))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!tb[IFA_LOCAL])
+ tb[IFA_LOCAL] = tb[IFA_ADDRESS];
+ if (inet_addr_match_rta(&filter.pfx, tb[IFA_LOCAL]))
+ continue;
ok = 1;
break;
There at least two places in ip/ipaddress.c where we match IFA_LABEL against filter.label if that is given. Get rid of "common" if () statement for inet_addr_match_rta() and ifa_label_match_rta(): it is not common because first will check for filter.pfx.family != AF_UNSPEC inside and second for filter.label being non NULL. This allows us to further simplify down code and prepare for ll_idx_n2a() replacement with ll_index_to_name() without 80 columns checkpatch notice. Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@gmail.com> --- ip/ipaddress.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)