From patchwork Wed Jan 10 01:58:48 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stephen Boyd X-Patchwork-Id: 857880 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="K0lUowr+"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="K0lUowr+"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zGXJQ4BsSz9t1t for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:59:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933144AbeAJB7f (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:59:35 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42312 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933193AbeAJB6w (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:58:52 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E63AC60BE8; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 01:58:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1515549531; bh=rh1UqFqSxXtz45tUX2kPbNQ04b5p1vRJ7QXZHJx1jdI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K0lUowr+u9SjG5rq2u1queaDwMTzG0+WtZucDcuaZ2LdXPrYc+X3hOTsDNovIUpeB HOo8O4SKvGmYanNxpXf7AzCZzbosXw/OJqBdM/+jMwTxLsAZMzqAeXXnC+UaC73DUD Qm50UbsmhgwENXk6bxXUnjGW+5+GDtERgogQgW5A= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from sboyd-linux.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sboyd@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAB2660B1B; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 01:58:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1515549531; bh=rh1UqFqSxXtz45tUX2kPbNQ04b5p1vRJ7QXZHJx1jdI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K0lUowr+u9SjG5rq2u1queaDwMTzG0+WtZucDcuaZ2LdXPrYc+X3hOTsDNovIUpeB HOo8O4SKvGmYanNxpXf7AzCZzbosXw/OJqBdM/+jMwTxLsAZMzqAeXXnC+UaC73DUD Qm50UbsmhgwENXk6bxXUnjGW+5+GDtERgogQgW5A= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org BAB2660B1B Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sboyd@codeaurora.org From: Stephen Boyd To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Timur Tabi , Andy Shevchenko , Bjorn Andersson , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Don't allow protected pins to be requested Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:58:48 -0800 Message-Id: <20180110015848.11480-4-sboyd@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.0.374.g5f9953d2c365 In-Reply-To: <20180110015848.11480-1-sboyd@codeaurora.org> References: <20180110015848.11480-1-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Some qcom platforms make some GPIOs or pins unavailable for use by non-secure operating systems, and thus reading or writing the registers for those pins will cause access control issues and reset the device. With a DT/ACPI property to describe the set of pins that are available for use, parse the available pins and set the irq valid bits for gpiolib to know what to consider 'valid'. This should avoid any issues with gpiolib. Furthermore, implement the pinmux_ops::request function so that pinmux can also make sure to not use pins that are unavailable. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd --- drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c index 7a960590ecaa..4a251268ebc4 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c @@ -105,6 +105,17 @@ static const struct pinctrl_ops msm_pinctrl_ops = { .dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map, }; +static int msm_pinmux_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned offset) +{ + struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); + struct gpio_chip *chip = &pctrl->chip; + + if (gpiochip_irqchip_irq_valid(chip, offset)) + return 0; + + return -EINVAL; +} + static int msm_get_functions_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) { struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); @@ -166,6 +177,7 @@ static int msm_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, } static const struct pinmux_ops msm_pinmux_ops = { + .request = msm_pinmux_request, .get_functions_count = msm_get_functions_count, .get_function_name = msm_get_function_name, .get_function_groups = msm_get_function_groups, @@ -506,6 +518,9 @@ static void msm_gpio_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s, "pull up" }; + if (!gpiochip_irqchip_irq_valid(chip, offset)) + return; + g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset]; ctl_reg = readl(pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg); @@ -516,7 +531,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s, seq_printf(s, " %-8s: %-3s %d", g->name, is_out ? "out" : "in", func); seq_printf(s, " %dmA", msm_regval_to_drive(drive)); - seq_printf(s, " %s", pulls[pull]); + seq_printf(s, " %s\n", pulls[pull]); } static void msm_gpio_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip) @@ -524,10 +539,8 @@ static void msm_gpio_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip) unsigned gpio = chip->base; unsigned i; - for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++, gpio++) { + for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++, gpio++) msm_gpio_dbg_show_one(s, NULL, chip, i, gpio); - seq_puts(s, "\n"); - } } #else @@ -808,6 +821,76 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); } +static int msm_gpio_init_irq_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *chip, + struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl) +{ + int ret; + unsigned int len, i; + unsigned int max_gpios = pctrl->soc->ngpios; + struct device_node *np = pctrl->dev->of_node; + + /* The number of GPIOs in the ACPI tables */ + ret = device_property_read_u16_array(pctrl->dev, "gpios", NULL, 0); + if (ret > 0 && ret < max_gpios) { + u16 *tmp; + + len = ret; + tmp = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(tmp[0]), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tmp) + return -ENOMEM; + + ret = device_property_read_u16_array(pctrl->dev, "gpios", tmp, + len); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(pctrl->dev, "could not read list of GPIOs\n"); + kfree(tmp); + return ret; + } + + bitmap_zero(chip->irq_valid_mask, max_gpios); + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) + set_bit(tmp[i], chip->irq_valid_mask); + + return 0; + } + + /* If there's a DT ngpios-ranges property then add those ranges */ + ret = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "ngpios-ranges"); + if (ret > 0 && ret % 2 == 0 && ret / 2 < max_gpios) { + u32 start; + u32 count; + + len = ret / 2; + bitmap_zero(chip->irq_valid_mask, max_gpios); + + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { + of_property_read_u32_index(np, "ngpios-ranges", + i * 2, &start); + of_property_read_u32_index(np, "ngpios-ranges", + i * 2 + 1, &count); + bitmap_set(chip->irq_valid_mask, start, count); + } + } + + return 0; +} + +static bool msm_gpio_needs_irq_valid_mask(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl) +{ + int ret; + struct device_node *np = pctrl->dev->of_node; + + ret = device_property_read_u16_array(pctrl->dev, "gpios", NULL, 0); + if (ret > 0) + return true; + + ret = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "ngpios-ranges"); + if (ret > 0 && ret % 2 == 0) + return true; + + return false; +} + static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl) { struct gpio_chip *chip; @@ -824,6 +907,7 @@ static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl) chip->parent = pctrl->dev; chip->owner = THIS_MODULE; chip->of_node = pctrl->dev->of_node; + chip->irq_need_valid_mask = msm_gpio_needs_irq_valid_mask(pctrl); ret = gpiochip_add_data(&pctrl->chip, pctrl); if (ret) { @@ -831,6 +915,12 @@ static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl) return ret; } + ret = msm_gpio_init_irq_valid_mask(chip, pctrl); + if (ret) { + dev_err(pctrl->dev, "Failed to setup irq valid bits\n"); + return ret; + } + ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip, dev_name(pctrl->dev), 0, 0, chip->ngpio); if (ret) { dev_err(pctrl->dev, "Failed to add pin range\n");