diff mbox series

[30/67] dma-direct: retry allocations using GFP_DMA for small masks

Message ID 20171229081911.2802-31-hch@lst.de
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show
Series [01/67] x86: remove X86_PPRO_FENCE | expand

Commit Message

Christoph Hellwig Dec. 29, 2017, 8:18 a.m. UTC
If we got back an allocation that wasn't inside the support coherent mask,
retry the allocation using GFP_DMA.

Based on the x86 code.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 lib/dma-direct.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Vladimir Murzin Jan. 2, 2018, 4:43 p.m. UTC | #1
On 29/12/17 08:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> If we got back an allocation that wasn't inside the support coherent mask,
> retry the allocation using GFP_DMA.
> 
> Based on the x86 code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  lib/dma-direct.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/dma-direct.c b/lib/dma-direct.c
> index ab81de3ac1d3..f8467cb3d89a 100644
> --- a/lib/dma-direct.c
> +++ b/lib/dma-direct.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ check_addr(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +static bool dma_coherent_ok(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> +{
> +	return phys_to_dma(dev, phys) + size <= dev->coherent_dma_mask;

Shouldn't it be: phys_to_dma(dev, phys) + size - 1 <= dev->coherent_dma_mask ?

> +}
> +
>  static void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  		dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp, unsigned long attrs)
>  {
> @@ -35,11 +40,29 @@ static void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  	int page_order = get_order(size);
>  	struct page *page = NULL;
>  
> +again:
>  	/* CMA can be used only in the context which permits sleeping */
> -	if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
> +	if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) {
>  		page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, count, page_order, gfp);
> +		if (page && !dma_coherent_ok(dev, page_to_phys(page), size)) {
> +			dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page, count);
> +			page = NULL;
> +		}
> +	}
>  	if (!page)
>  		page = alloc_pages_node(dev_to_node(dev), gfp, page_order);
> +
> +	if (page && !dma_coherent_ok(dev, page_to_phys(page), size)) {
> +		__free_pages(page, page_order);
> +		page = NULL;
> +
> +		if (dev->coherent_dma_mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(32) &&
> +		    !(gfp & GFP_DMA)) {
> +			gfp = (gfp & ~GFP_DMA32) | GFP_DMA;
> +			goto again;

Shouldn't we limit number of attempts?

Thanks
Vladimir

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Christoph Hellwig Jan. 4, 2018, 9:02 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 29/12/17 08:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > If we got back an allocation that wasn't inside the support coherent mask,
> > retry the allocation using GFP_DMA.
> > 
> > Based on the x86 code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > ---
> >  lib/dma-direct.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/dma-direct.c b/lib/dma-direct.c
> > index ab81de3ac1d3..f8467cb3d89a 100644
> > --- a/lib/dma-direct.c
> > +++ b/lib/dma-direct.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ check_addr(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool dma_coherent_ok(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +	return phys_to_dma(dev, phys) + size <= dev->coherent_dma_mask;
> 
> Shouldn't it be: phys_to_dma(dev, phys) + size - 1 <= dev->coherent_dma_mask ?

Yes, I think it should.  The existing code was blindly copy and pasted
from x86.

> > +	if (page && !dma_coherent_ok(dev, page_to_phys(page), size)) {
> > +		__free_pages(page, page_order);
> > +		page = NULL;
> > +
> > +		if (dev->coherent_dma_mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(32) &&
> > +		    !(gfp & GFP_DMA)) {
> > +			gfp = (gfp & ~GFP_DMA32) | GFP_DMA;
> > +			goto again;
> 
> Shouldn't we limit number of attempts?

We only retty once anyway, due to the !GFP_DMA check first and then
ORing in GFP_DMA.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/lib/dma-direct.c b/lib/dma-direct.c
index ab81de3ac1d3..f8467cb3d89a 100644
--- a/lib/dma-direct.c
+++ b/lib/dma-direct.c
@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@  check_addr(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool dma_coherent_ok(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
+{
+	return phys_to_dma(dev, phys) + size <= dev->coherent_dma_mask;
+}
+
 static void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 		dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp, unsigned long attrs)
 {
@@ -35,11 +40,29 @@  static void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 	int page_order = get_order(size);
 	struct page *page = NULL;
 
+again:
 	/* CMA can be used only in the context which permits sleeping */
-	if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
+	if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) {
 		page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, count, page_order, gfp);
+		if (page && !dma_coherent_ok(dev, page_to_phys(page), size)) {
+			dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page, count);
+			page = NULL;
+		}
+	}
 	if (!page)
 		page = alloc_pages_node(dev_to_node(dev), gfp, page_order);
+
+	if (page && !dma_coherent_ok(dev, page_to_phys(page), size)) {
+		__free_pages(page, page_order);
+		page = NULL;
+
+		if (dev->coherent_dma_mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(32) &&
+		    !(gfp & GFP_DMA)) {
+			gfp = (gfp & ~GFP_DMA32) | GFP_DMA;
+			goto again;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (!page)
 		return NULL;