mbox series

[GIT,PULL,2/3] arm64: dts: exynos: DTS for v4.16

Message ID 20171220173643.5840-4-krzk@kernel.org
State New
Headers show
Series ARM: exynos: Pull for v4.16 | expand

Pull-request

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-dt64-4.16

Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski Dec. 20, 2017, 5:36 p.m. UTC
The following changes since commit 4fbd8d194f06c8a3fd2af1ce560ddb31f7ec8323:

  Linux 4.15-rc1 (2017-11-26 16:01:47 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-dt64-4.16

for you to fetch changes up to 3808354701090723b53c73afaccfcafdeb8a5bfe:

  arm64: dts: exynos: Increase bus frequency for MHL chip (2017-12-04 17:51:10 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Samsung DTS ARM64 changes for v4.16

1. Add CPU perf counters to Exynos5433.
2. Add missing power domains to Exynos5433.
3. Add NFC chip to Exynos5433 TM2/TM2E.
4. Fix obscure bugs on I2C transfers to MHL chip on TM2/TM2E.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Andrzej Hajda (1):
      arm64: dts: exynos: Increase bus frequency for MHL chip

Marek Szyprowski (8):
      arm64: dts: exynos: Add CPU performance counters to Exynos5433 boards
      arm64: dts: exynos: Add support for S3FWRN5 NFC chip to TM2(e) boards
      arm64: dts: exynos: Add GSCL power domain to Exynos 5433 SoC
      arm64: dts: exynos: Add DISP power domain to Exynos 5433 SoC
      arm64: dts: exynos: Add MSCL power domain to Exynos 5433 SoC
      arm64: dts: exynos: Add MFC power domain to Exynos 5433 SoC
      arm64: dts: exynos: Add AUD power domain to Exynos5433 SoC
      arm64: dts: exynos: Add remaining power domains to Exynos5433 SoC

 .../boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi     |  14 +++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi         | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Dec. 21, 2017, 4:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> Samsung DTS ARM64 changes for v4.16
>
> 1. Add CPU perf counters to Exynos5433.
> 2. Add missing power domains to Exynos5433.
> 3. Add NFC chip to Exynos5433 TM2/TM2E.
> 4. Fix obscure bugs on I2C transfers to MHL chip on TM2/TM2E.

Pulled into next/dt, thanks!

One question: do you know if anyone is working on support for the newer
Exynos chips, or the Nexell S5P6818 series? It seems odd that none of
the chips from the past three years are supported yet.

     Arnd
Krzysztof Kozlowski Dec. 21, 2017, 7:31 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>> Samsung DTS ARM64 changes for v4.16
>>
>> 1. Add CPU perf counters to Exynos5433.
>> 2. Add missing power domains to Exynos5433.
>> 3. Add NFC chip to Exynos5433 TM2/TM2E.
>> 4. Fix obscure bugs on I2C transfers to MHL chip on TM2/TM2E.
>
> Pulled into next/dt, thanks!
>
> One question: do you know if anyone is working on support for the newer
> Exynos chips, or the Nexell S5P6818 series? It seems odd that none of
> the chips from the past three years are supported yet.

For the new Exynos chips - I think Samsung folks are working on them.
Indeed it looks like the pace for new chips has slowed down.

The Nexell series are similar to Exynos but this is different company
so probably they would end up in different sub-arch. Only some IP
blocks are similar to Exynos even though the datasheet has Samsung
marks. I saw patches for U-Boot (I do not remember the author) so
maybe soon something will happen on LKML.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Arnd Bergmann Dec. 21, 2017, 8:04 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The Nexell series are similar to Exynos but this is different company
> so probably they would end up in different sub-arch. Only some IP
> blocks are similar to Exynos even though the datasheet has Samsung
> marks. I saw patches for U-Boot (I do not remember the author) so
> maybe soon something will happen on LKML.

Ok. When I looked at an old 32-bit 3.4 kernel tree, I could see no similarity
to Exynos, but it seems that there is now an active development tree for
a 64-bit 4.x kernel for the Samsung Artik board series, just no patches.

       Arnd