diff mbox series

[PULL,04/10] backup: simplify non-dirty bits progress processing

Message ID 20171218210819.31576-5-jcody@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series [PULL,01/10] hbitmap: add next_zero function | expand

Commit Message

Jeff Cody Dec. 18, 2017, 9:08 p.m. UTC 
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

Set fake progress for non-dirty clusters in copy_bitmap initialization,
to. It simplifies code and allows further refactoring.

This patch changes user's view of backup progress, but formally it
doesn't changed: progress hops are just moved to the beginning.

Actually it's just a point of view: when do we actually skip clusters?
We can say in the very beginning, that we skip these clusters and do
not think about them later.

Of course, if go through disk sequentially, it's logical to say, that
we skip clusters between copied portions to the left and to the right
of them. But even now copying progress is not sequential because of
write notifiers. Future patches will introduce new backup architecture
which will do copying in several coroutines in parallel, so it will
make no sense to publish fake progress by parts in parallel with
other copying requests.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20171012135313.227864-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
---
 block/backup.c | 18 +++---------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
index b8901ea..8ee2200 100644
--- a/block/backup.c
+++ b/block/backup.c
@@ -369,7 +369,6 @@  static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
     int64_t offset;
     int64_t cluster;
     int64_t end;
-    int64_t last_cluster = -1;
     BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *dbi;
 
     granularity = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(job->sync_bitmap);
@@ -380,12 +379,6 @@  static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
     while ((offset = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(dbi)) >= 0) {
         cluster = offset / job->cluster_size;
 
-        /* Fake progress updates for any clusters we skipped */
-        if (cluster != last_cluster + 1) {
-            job->common.offset += ((cluster - last_cluster - 1) *
-                                   job->cluster_size);
-        }
-
         for (end = cluster + clusters_per_iter; cluster < end; cluster++) {
             do {
                 if (yield_and_check(job)) {
@@ -407,14 +400,6 @@  static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
         if (granularity < job->cluster_size) {
             bdrv_set_dirty_iter(dbi, cluster * job->cluster_size);
         }
-
-        last_cluster = cluster - 1;
-    }
-
-    /* Play some final catchup with the progress meter */
-    end = DIV_ROUND_UP(job->common.len, job->cluster_size);
-    if (last_cluster + 1 < end) {
-        job->common.offset += ((end - last_cluster - 1) * job->cluster_size);
     }
 
 out:
@@ -456,6 +441,9 @@  static void backup_incremental_init_copy_bitmap(BackupBlockJob *job)
         bdrv_set_dirty_iter(dbi, next_cluster * job->cluster_size);
     }
 
+    job->common.offset = job->common.len -
+                         hbitmap_count(job->copy_bitmap) * job->cluster_size;
+
     bdrv_dirty_iter_free(dbi);
 }