diff mbox series

[1/3] acpi: dbg2: sbbr: allow PL011 UART as a valid subtype

Message ID 1513621711-7976-1-git-send-email-sakar.arora@arm.com
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [1/3] acpi: dbg2: sbbr: allow PL011 UART as a valid subtype | expand

Commit Message

Sakar Arora Dec. 18, 2017, 6:28 p.m. UTC
The ARM PL011 UART is a superset of ARM SBSA UART and some ARM server
implementations use it.

Signed-off-by: Sakar Arora <sakar.arora@arm.com>
---
 src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Alex Hung Dec. 19, 2017, 1:51 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2017-12-19 02:28 AM, Sakar Arora wrote:
> The ARM PL011 UART is a superset of ARM SBSA UART and some ARM server
> implementations use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sakar Arora <sakar.arora@arm.com>
> ---
>   src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c | 10 ++++++----
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c b/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c
> index b826c27..eef5ee7 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c
> @@ -28,8 +28,9 @@
>   
>   #include "fwts_acpi_object_eval.h"
>   
> -#define SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL   0x8000
> -#define SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART 0x000E
> +#define SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL     0x8000
> +#define SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART   0x000E
> +#define SBBR_DBG2_ARM_PL011_UART  0x0003
>   
>   static fwts_acpi_table_info *table;
>   
> @@ -71,8 +72,9 @@ static int dbg2_test2(fwts_framework *fw)
>   			break;
>   		if (((uint8_t*)info + info->length) >= ((uint8_t*)table + table->length))
>   			break;
> -		if ((info->port_type == SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL) &&
> -		(info->port_subtype == SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART)) {
> +		if (info->port_type == SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL &&
> +		   (info->port_subtype == SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART ||
> +		    info->port_subtype == SBBR_DBG2_ARM_PL011_UART)) {
>   			fwts_passed(fw,
>   				"DBG2 provides a standard serial debug "
>   				"port and describes ARM SBSA Generic UART");
> 


Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
Alex Hung Dec. 19, 2017, 1:51 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2017-12-19 02:28 AM, Sakar Arora wrote:
> A valid combination of mif/maf values is not mandatory,
> as per SBBR spec. So, an invalid combination should only
> cause a warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sakar Arora <sakar.arora@arm.com>
> ---
>   src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c b/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
> index b356441..b3537b0 100644
> --- a/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
> +++ b/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
> @@ -1270,32 +1270,51 @@ static void method_test_CRS_mif_maf(
>   	if (len == 0) {
>   		if ((mif == 1) && (maf == 1)) {
>   			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMifMafBothOne", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are both "
> -				"set to one which is invalid when "
> -				"the length field is 0.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are both "
> +					"set to one which is invalid when "
> +					"the length field is 0.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are both "
> +					"set to one which is invalid when "
> +					"the length field is 0.",
> +					name, type);
>   			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>   			*passed = false;
>   		}
>   		if ((mif == 1) && (min % (granularity + 1) != 0)) {
>   			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMinNotMultipleOfGran", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s _MIN address is not a multiple "
> -				"of the granularity when _MIF is 1.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIN address is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MIF is 1.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIN address is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MIF is 1.",
> +					name, type);
>   			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>   			*passed = false;
>   		}
>   		if ((maf == 1) && (max % (granularity - 1) != 0)) {
>   			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMaxNotMultipleOfGran", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s _MAX address is not a multiple "
> -				"of the granularity when _MAF is 1.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MAX address is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MAF is 1.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MAX address is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MAF is 1.",
> +					name, type);
>   			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>   			*passed = false;
>   		}
> @@ -1303,58 +1322,94 @@ static void method_test_CRS_mif_maf(
>   		if ((mif == 0) && (maf == 0) &&
>   		    (len % (granularity + 1) != 0)) {
>   			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sLenNotMultipleOfGran", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s length is not a multiple "
> -				"of the granularity when _MIF "
> -				"and _MIF are 0.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s length is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MIF "
> +					"and _MIF are 0.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s length is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MIF "
> +					"and _MIF are 0.",
> +					name, type);
>   			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>   			*passed = false;
>   		}
>   		if (((mif == 0) && (maf == 1)) || ((mif == 1) && (maf == 0))) {
>   			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMifMafInvalid", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are either "
> -				"0 and 1 or 1 and 0 which is invalid when "
> -				"the length field is non-zero.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are either "
> +					"0 and 1 or 1 and 0 which is invalid when "
> +					"the length field is non-zero.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are either "
> +					"0 and 1 or 1 and 0 which is invalid when "
> +					"the length field is non-zero.",
> +					name, type);
>   			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>   			*passed = false;
>   		}
>   		if ((mif == 1) && (maf == 1)) {
>   			if (granularity != 0) {
>   				snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sGranularityNotZero", objname, tag);
> -				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -					tmp,
> -					"%s %s granularity 0x%" PRIx64
> -					" is not zero as expected when "
> -					"_MIF and _MAF are both 1.",
> -					name, type, granularity);
> +				if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +					fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +						"%s %s granularity 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" is not zero as expected when "
> +						"_MIF and _MAF are both 1.",
> +						name, type, granularity);
> +				else
> +					fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +						tmp,
> +						"%s %s granularity 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" is not zero as expected when "
> +						"_MIF and _MAF are both 1.",
> +						name, type, granularity);
>   				fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>   				*passed = false;
>   			}
>   			if (min > max) {
>   				snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMaxLessThanMin", objname, tag);
> -				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -					tmp,
> -					"%s %s minimum address range 0x%" PRIx64
> -					" is greater than the maximum address "
> -					"range 0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> -					name, type, min, max);
> +				if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +					fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +						"%s %s minimum address range 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" is greater than the maximum address "
> +						"range 0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> +						name, type, min, max);
> +				else
> +					fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +						tmp,
> +						"%s %s minimum address range 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" is greater than the maximum address "
> +						"range 0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> +						name, type, min, max);
>   				fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>   				*passed = false;
>   			}
>   			if (max - min + 1 != len) {
>   				snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sLengthInvalid", objname, tag);
> -				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -					tmp,
> -					"%s %s length 0x%" PRIx64
> -					" does not match the difference between "
> -					"the minimum and maximum address ranges "
> -					"0x%" PRIx64 "-0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> -					name, type, len, min, max);
> +				if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +					fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +						"%s %s length 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" does not match the difference between "
> +						"the minimum and maximum address ranges "
> +						"0x%" PRIx64 "-0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> +						name, type, len, min, max);
> +				else
> +					fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +						tmp,
> +						"%s %s length 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" does not match the difference between "
> +						"the minimum and maximum address ranges "
> +						"0x%" PRIx64 "-0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> +						name, type, len, min, max);
>   				fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>   				*passed = false;
>   			}
> 

Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
Ivan Hu Dec. 19, 2017, 6:53 a.m. UTC | #3
On 12/19/2017 02:28 AM, Sakar Arora wrote:
> The ARM PL011 UART is a superset of ARM SBSA UART and some ARM server
> implementations use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakar Arora <sakar.arora@arm.com>
> ---
>  src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c b/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c
> index b826c27..eef5ee7 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c
> @@ -28,8 +28,9 @@
>  
>  #include "fwts_acpi_object_eval.h"
>  
> -#define SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL   0x8000
> -#define SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART 0x000E
> +#define SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL     0x8000
> +#define SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART   0x000E
> +#define SBBR_DBG2_ARM_PL011_UART  0x0003
>  
>  static fwts_acpi_table_info *table;
>  
> @@ -71,8 +72,9 @@ static int dbg2_test2(fwts_framework *fw)
>  			break;
>  		if (((uint8_t*)info + info->length) >= ((uint8_t*)table + table->length))
>  			break;
> -		if ((info->port_type == SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL) &&
> -		(info->port_subtype == SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART)) {
> +		if (info->port_type == SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL &&
> +		   (info->port_subtype == SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART ||
> +		    info->port_subtype == SBBR_DBG2_ARM_PL011_UART)) {
>  			fwts_passed(fw,
>  				"DBG2 provides a standard serial debug "
>  				"port and describes ARM SBSA Generic UART");
Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@canonical.com>
Ivan Hu Dec. 19, 2017, 6:54 a.m. UTC | #4
On 12/19/2017 02:28 AM, Sakar Arora wrote:
> A valid combination of mif/maf values is not mandatory,
> as per SBBR spec. So, an invalid combination should only
> cause a warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakar Arora <sakar.arora@arm.com>
> ---
>  src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c b/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
> index b356441..b3537b0 100644
> --- a/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
> +++ b/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
> @@ -1270,32 +1270,51 @@ static void method_test_CRS_mif_maf(
>  	if (len == 0) {
>  		if ((mif == 1) && (maf == 1)) {
>  			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMifMafBothOne", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are both "
> -				"set to one which is invalid when "
> -				"the length field is 0.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are both "
> +					"set to one which is invalid when "
> +					"the length field is 0.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are both "
> +					"set to one which is invalid when "
> +					"the length field is 0.",
> +					name, type);
>  			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>  			*passed = false;
>  		}
>  		if ((mif == 1) && (min % (granularity + 1) != 0)) {
>  			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMinNotMultipleOfGran", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s _MIN address is not a multiple "
> -				"of the granularity when _MIF is 1.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIN address is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MIF is 1.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIN address is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MIF is 1.",
> +					name, type);
>  			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>  			*passed = false;
>  		}
>  		if ((maf == 1) && (max % (granularity - 1) != 0)) {
>  			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMaxNotMultipleOfGran", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s _MAX address is not a multiple "
> -				"of the granularity when _MAF is 1.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MAX address is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MAF is 1.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MAX address is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MAF is 1.",
> +					name, type);
>  			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>  			*passed = false;
>  		}
> @@ -1303,58 +1322,94 @@ static void method_test_CRS_mif_maf(
>  		if ((mif == 0) && (maf == 0) &&
>  		    (len % (granularity + 1) != 0)) {
>  			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sLenNotMultipleOfGran", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s length is not a multiple "
> -				"of the granularity when _MIF "
> -				"and _MIF are 0.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s length is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MIF "
> +					"and _MIF are 0.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s length is not a multiple "
> +					"of the granularity when _MIF "
> +					"and _MIF are 0.",
> +					name, type);
>  			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>  			*passed = false;
>  		}
>  		if (((mif == 0) && (maf == 1)) || ((mif == 1) && (maf == 0))) {
>  			snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMifMafInvalid", objname, tag);
> -			fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -				tmp,
> -				"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are either "
> -				"0 and 1 or 1 and 0 which is invalid when "
> -				"the length field is non-zero.",
> -				name, type);
> +			if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +				fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are either "
> +					"0 and 1 or 1 and 0 which is invalid when "
> +					"the length field is non-zero.",
> +					name, type);
> +			else
> +				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +					tmp,
> +					"%s %s _MIF and _MAF flags are either "
> +					"0 and 1 or 1 and 0 which is invalid when "
> +					"the length field is non-zero.",
> +					name, type);
>  			fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>  			*passed = false;
>  		}
>  		if ((mif == 1) && (maf == 1)) {
>  			if (granularity != 0) {
>  				snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sGranularityNotZero", objname, tag);
> -				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -					tmp,
> -					"%s %s granularity 0x%" PRIx64
> -					" is not zero as expected when "
> -					"_MIF and _MAF are both 1.",
> -					name, type, granularity);
> +				if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +					fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +						"%s %s granularity 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" is not zero as expected when "
> +						"_MIF and _MAF are both 1.",
> +						name, type, granularity);
> +				else
> +					fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +						tmp,
> +						"%s %s granularity 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" is not zero as expected when "
> +						"_MIF and _MAF are both 1.",
> +						name, type, granularity);
>  				fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>  				*passed = false;
>  			}
>  			if (min > max) {
>  				snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sMaxLessThanMin", objname, tag);
> -				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -					tmp,
> -					"%s %s minimum address range 0x%" PRIx64
> -					" is greater than the maximum address "
> -					"range 0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> -					name, type, min, max);
> +				if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +					fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +						"%s %s minimum address range 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" is greater than the maximum address "
> +						"range 0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> +						name, type, min, max);
> +				else
> +					fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +						tmp,
> +						"%s %s minimum address range 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" is greater than the maximum address "
> +						"range 0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> +						name, type, min, max);
>  				fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>  				*passed = false;
>  			}
>  			if (max - min + 1 != len) {
>  				snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "Method%s%sLengthInvalid", objname, tag);
> -				fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> -					tmp,
> -					"%s %s length 0x%" PRIx64
> -					" does not match the difference between "
> -					"the minimum and maximum address ranges "
> -					"0x%" PRIx64 "-0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> -					name, type, len, min, max);
> +				if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> +					fwts_warning(fw, tmp,
> +						"%s %s length 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" does not match the difference between "
> +						"the minimum and maximum address ranges "
> +						"0x%" PRIx64 "-0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> +						name, type, len, min, max);
> +				else
> +					fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
> +						tmp,
> +						"%s %s length 0x%" PRIx64
> +						" does not match the difference between "
> +						"the minimum and maximum address ranges "
> +						"0x%" PRIx64 "-0x%" PRIx64 ".",
> +						name, type, len, min, max);
>  				fwts_advice(fw, "%s", mif_maf_advice);
>  				*passed = false;
>  			}
Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@canonical.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c b/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c
index b826c27..eef5ee7 100644
--- a/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c
+++ b/src/acpi/dbg2/dbg2.c
@@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ 
 
 #include "fwts_acpi_object_eval.h"
 
-#define SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL   0x8000
-#define SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART 0x000E
+#define SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL     0x8000
+#define SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART   0x000E
+#define SBBR_DBG2_ARM_PL011_UART  0x0003
 
 static fwts_acpi_table_info *table;
 
@@ -71,8 +72,9 @@  static int dbg2_test2(fwts_framework *fw)
 			break;
 		if (((uint8_t*)info + info->length) >= ((uint8_t*)table + table->length))
 			break;
-		if ((info->port_type == SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL) &&
-		(info->port_subtype == SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART)) {
+		if (info->port_type == SBBR_DBG2_PORT_SERIAL &&
+		   (info->port_subtype == SBBR_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_UART ||
+		    info->port_subtype == SBBR_DBG2_ARM_PL011_UART)) {
 			fwts_passed(fw,
 				"DBG2 provides a standard serial debug "
 				"port and describes ARM SBSA Generic UART");