[SRU,Zesty,Xenial,2/2] ipsec: Fix aborted xfrm policy dump crash

Message ID 20171201160716.30552-3-kleber.souza@canonical.com
State New
Headers show
Series
  • Fix for CVE-2017-16939
Related show

Commit Message

Kleber Souza Dec. 1, 2017, 4:07 p.m.
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

An independent security researcher, Mohamed Ghannam, has reported
this vulnerability to Beyond Security's SecuriTeam Secure Disclosure
program.

The xfrm_dump_policy_done function expects xfrm_dump_policy to
have been called at least once or it will crash.  This can be
triggered if a dump fails because the target socket's receive
buffer is full.

This patch fixes it by using the cb->start mechanism to ensure that
the initialisation is always done regardless of the buffer situation.

Fixes: 12a169e7d8f4 ("ipsec: Put dumpers on the dump list")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>

CVE-2017-16939
(cherry picked from commit 1137b5e2529a8f5ca8ee709288ecba3e68044df2)
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Dec. 4, 2017, 10:40 a.m. | #1
Applied to zesty master-next branch.

Thanks.
Cascardo.

Applied-to: zesty/master-next

Patch

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 7a5a64e70b4d..76944a4839a5 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1652,32 +1652,34 @@  static int dump_one_policy(struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir, int count, void *ptr
 
 static int xfrm_dump_policy_done(struct netlink_callback *cb)
 {
-	struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *) &cb->args[1];
+	struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args;
 	struct net *net = sock_net(cb->skb->sk);
 
 	xfrm_policy_walk_done(walk, net);
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int xfrm_dump_policy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
+{
+	struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args;
+
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*walk) > sizeof(cb->args));
+
+	xfrm_policy_walk_init(walk, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_ANY);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int xfrm_dump_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 {
 	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
-	struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *) &cb->args[1];
+	struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args;
 	struct xfrm_dump_info info;
 
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct xfrm_policy_walk) >
-		     sizeof(cb->args) - sizeof(cb->args[0]));
-
 	info.in_skb = cb->skb;
 	info.out_skb = skb;
 	info.nlmsg_seq = cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
 	info.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_MULTI;
 
-	if (!cb->args[0]) {
-		cb->args[0] = 1;
-		xfrm_policy_walk_init(walk, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_ANY);
-	}
-
 	(void) xfrm_policy_walk(net, walk, dump_one_policy, &info);
 
 	return skb->len;
@@ -2415,6 +2417,7 @@  static const struct nla_policy xfrma_spd_policy[XFRMA_SPD_MAX+1] = {
 
 static const struct xfrm_link {
 	int (*doit)(struct sk_buff *, struct nlmsghdr *, struct nlattr **);
+	int (*start)(struct netlink_callback *);
 	int (*dump)(struct sk_buff *, struct netlink_callback *);
 	int (*done)(struct netlink_callback *);
 	const struct nla_policy *nla_pol;
@@ -2428,6 +2431,7 @@  static const struct xfrm_link {
 	[XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY   - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_policy    },
 	[XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY   - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy    },
 	[XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY   - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy,
+						   .start = xfrm_dump_policy_start,
 						   .dump = xfrm_dump_policy,
 						   .done = xfrm_dump_policy_done },
 	[XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI    - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_alloc_userspi },
@@ -2479,6 +2483,7 @@  static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
 
 		{
 			struct netlink_dump_control c = {
+				.start = link->start,
 				.dump = link->dump,
 				.done = link->done,
 			};