@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ int mlx5e_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
struct mlx5e_channel *c = container_of(napi, struct mlx5e_channel,
napi);
bool busy = false;
- int work_done;
+ int work_done = 0;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < c->num_tc; i++)
@@ -58,15 +58,17 @@ int mlx5e_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
if (c->xdp)
busy |= mlx5e_poll_xdpsq_cq(&c->rq.xdpsq.cq);
- work_done = mlx5e_poll_rx_cq(&c->rq.cq, budget);
- busy |= work_done == budget;
+ if (likely(budget)) { /* budget=0 means: don't poll rx rings */
+ work_done = mlx5e_poll_rx_cq(&c->rq.cq, budget);
+ busy |= work_done == budget;
+ }
busy |= c->rq.post_wqes(&c->rq);
if (busy) {
if (likely(mlx5e_channel_no_affinity_change(c)))
return budget;
- if (work_done == budget)
+ if (budget && work_done == budget)
work_done--;
}
napi->poll can be called with budget 0, e.g. in netpoll scenarios where the caller only wants to poll TX rings (poll_one_napi@net/core/netpoll.c). The below commit changed RX polling from "while" loop to "do {} while", which caused to ignore the initial budget and handle at least one RX packet. This fixes the following warning: [ 2852.049194] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x0/0x260 [mlx5_core] exceeded budget in poll [ 2852.049195] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2852.049195] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 25691 at net/core/netpoll.c:171 netpoll_poll_dev+0x18a/0x1a0 Fixes: 4b7dfc992514 ("net/mlx5e: Early-return on empty completion queues") Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Tested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: kernel-team@fb.com Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_txrx.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)