[4/4,v3] pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: add support for new ACPI HID QCOM8002

Message ID 1510096056-13765-5-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org
State New
Headers show
Series
  • pinctrl: qcom: add support for sparse GPIOs
Related show

Commit Message

Timur Tabi Nov. 7, 2017, 11:07 p.m.
Newer versions of the firmware for the Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies
QDF2400 restricts access to a subset of the GPIOs on the TLMM.  To
prevent older kernels from accidentally accessing the restricted GPIOs,
we change the ACPI HID for the TLMM block from QCOM8001 to QCOM8002,
and introduce a new property "gpios".  This property is an array of
specific GPIOs that are accessible.  When an older kernel boots on
newer (restricted) firmware, it will fail to probe.

To implement the sparse GPIO map, we register all of the GPIOs, but set
the pin count for the unavailable GPIOs to zero.  The pinctrl-msm
driver will block those unavailable GPIOs from being accessed.

To allow newer kernels to support older firmware, the driver retains
support for QCOM8001.

Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

Comments

Varadarajan Narayanan Nov. 15, 2017, 6:47 a.m. | #1
Timur,

> Newer versions of the firmware for the Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies
> QDF2400 restricts access to a subset of the GPIOs on the TLMM.  To
> prevent older kernels from accidentally accessing the restricted GPIOs,
> we change the ACPI HID for the TLMM block from QCOM8001 to QCOM8002,
> and introduce a new property "gpios".  This property is an array of
> specific GPIOs that are accessible.  When an older kernel boots on
> newer (restricted) firmware, it will fail to probe.
>
> To implement the sparse GPIO map, we register all of the GPIOs, but set
> the pin count for the unavailable GPIOs to zero.  The pinctrl-msm
> driver will block those unavailable GPIOs from being accessed.
>
> To allow newer kernels to support older firmware, the driver retains
> support for QCOM8001.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c
> index bb3ce5c3e18b..37f746f6eb8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c
> @@ -38,68 +38,147 @@
>  /* maximum size of each gpio name (enough room for "gpioXXX" + null) */
>  #define NAME_SIZE	8
>
> +enum {
> +	QDF2XXX_V1,
> +	QDF2XXX_V2,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct acpi_device_id qdf2xxx_acpi_ids[] = {
> +	{"QCOM8001", QDF2XXX_V1},
> +	{"QCOM8002", QDF2XXX_V2},
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, qdf2xxx_acpi_ids);
> +
>  static int qdf2xxx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +	const struct acpi_device_id *id =
> +		acpi_match_device(qdf2xxx_acpi_ids, &pdev->dev);
>  	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
>  	struct msm_pingroup *groups;
>  	char (*names)[NAME_SIZE];
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	u32 num_gpios;
> +	unsigned int avail_gpios; /* The number of GPIOs we support */
> +	u16 *gpios; /* An array of supported GPIOs */
>  	int ret;
>
>  	/* Query the number of GPIOs from ACPI */
>  	ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "num-gpios", &num_gpios);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "missing num-gpios property\n");
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing 'num-gpios' property\n");
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> -
>  	if (!num_gpios || num_gpios > MAX_GPIOS) {
> -		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "invalid num-gpios property\n");
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid 'num-gpios' property\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>
> +	/*
> +	 * The QCOM8001 HID contains only the number of GPIOs, and assumes
> +	 * that all of them are available. avail_gpios is the same as num_gpios.
> +	 *
> +	 * The QCOM8002 HID introduces the 'gpios' DSD, which lists
> +	 * specific GPIOs that the driver is allowed to access.
> +	 *
> +	 * The make the common code simpler, in both cases we create an
> +	 * array of GPIOs that are accessible.  So for QCOM8001, that would
> +	 * be all of the GPIOs.
> +	 */
> +	if (id->driver_data == QDF2XXX_V1) {
> +		avail_gpios = num_gpios;
> +
> +		gpios = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, avail_gpios, sizeof(gpios[0]),
> +				     GFP_KERNEL);

Wouldn't kmalloc suffice since the array gets initialized just below.

> +		if (!gpios)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < avail_gpios; i++)
> +			gpios[i] = i;
> +	} else {
> +		/* The number of GPIOs in the approved list */
> +		ret = device_property_read_u16_array(&pdev->dev, "gpios",
> +						     NULL, 0);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing 'num-gpios' property\n");
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		if (!ret || ret > MAX_GPIOS) {

Instead of ret > MAX_GPIOS, should we check for ret > num_gpios?

> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid 'num-gpios' property\n");
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}

In both the above error messages 'num-gpios' should be 'gpios'

> +		avail_gpios = ret;
> +
> +		gpios = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, avail_gpios, sizeof(gpios[0]),
> +				     GFP_KERNEL);

devm_kmalloc?

Thanks
Varada

> +		if (!gpios)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		ret = device_property_read_u16_array(&pdev->dev, "gpios", gpios,
> +						     avail_gpios);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not read list of GPIOs\n");
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Because we have a specific list of GPIOs, the GPIO map
> +		 * is 'sparse'.
> +		 */
> +		qdf2xxx_pinctrl.sparse = true;
> +	}
> +
>  	pins = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_gpios,
>  		sizeof(struct pinctrl_pin_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	groups = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_gpios,
>  		sizeof(struct msm_pingroup), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	names = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_gpios, NAME_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	names = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, avail_gpios, NAME_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>
>  	if (!pins || !groups || !names)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> +	/*
> +	 * Initialize the array.  GPIOs not listed in the 'gpios' array
> +	 * still need a number, but nothing else.
> +	 */
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_gpios; i++) {
> -		snprintf(names[i], NAME_SIZE, "gpio%u", i);
> -
>  		pins[i].number = i;
> -		pins[i].name = names[i];
> -
> -		groups[i].npins = 1;
> -		groups[i].name = names[i];
>  		groups[i].pins = &pins[i].number;
> +	}
>
> -		groups[i].ctl_reg = 0x10000 * i;
> -		groups[i].io_reg = 0x04 + 0x10000 * i;
> -		groups[i].intr_cfg_reg = 0x08 + 0x10000 * i;
> -		groups[i].intr_status_reg = 0x0c + 0x10000 * i;
> -		groups[i].intr_target_reg = 0x08 + 0x10000 * i;
> -
> -		groups[i].mux_bit = 2;
> -		groups[i].pull_bit = 0;
> -		groups[i].drv_bit = 6;
> -		groups[i].oe_bit = 9;
> -		groups[i].in_bit = 0;
> -		groups[i].out_bit = 1;
> -		groups[i].intr_enable_bit = 0;
> -		groups[i].intr_status_bit = 0;
> -		groups[i].intr_target_bit = 5;
> -		groups[i].intr_target_kpss_val = 1;
> -		groups[i].intr_raw_status_bit = 4;
> -		groups[i].intr_polarity_bit = 1;
> -		groups[i].intr_detection_bit = 2;
> -		groups[i].intr_detection_width = 2;
> +	/* Populate the entries that are meant to be exposes as GPIOs. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < avail_gpios; i++) {
> +		unsigned int gpio = gpios[i];
> +
> +		groups[gpio].npins = 1;
> +		snprintf(names[i], NAME_SIZE, "gpio%u", gpio);
> +		pins[gpio].name = names[i];
> +		groups[gpio].name = names[i];
> +
> +		groups[gpio].ctl_reg = 0x10000 * gpio;
> +		groups[gpio].io_reg = 0x04 + 0x10000 * gpio;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_cfg_reg = 0x08 + 0x10000 * gpio;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_status_reg = 0x0c + 0x10000 * gpio;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_target_reg = 0x08 + 0x10000 * gpio;
> +
> +		groups[gpio].mux_bit = 2;
> +		groups[gpio].pull_bit = 0;
> +		groups[gpio].drv_bit = 6;
> +		groups[gpio].oe_bit = 9;
> +		groups[gpio].in_bit = 0;
> +		groups[gpio].out_bit = 1;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_enable_bit = 0;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_status_bit = 0;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_target_bit = 5;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_target_kpss_val = 1;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_raw_status_bit = 4;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_polarity_bit = 1;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_detection_bit = 2;
> +		groups[gpio].intr_detection_width = 2;
>  	}
>
> +	devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, gpios);
> +
>  	qdf2xxx_pinctrl.pins = pins;
>  	qdf2xxx_pinctrl.groups = groups;
>  	qdf2xxx_pinctrl.npins = num_gpios;
> @@ -109,12 +188,6 @@ static int qdf2xxx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return msm_pinctrl_probe(pdev, &qdf2xxx_pinctrl);
>  }
>
> -static const struct acpi_device_id qdf2xxx_acpi_ids[] = {
> -	{"QCOM8001"},
> -	{},
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, qdf2xxx_acpi_ids);
> -
>  static struct platform_driver qdf2xxx_pinctrl_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "qdf2xxx-pinctrl",
> --
> Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
> Technologies, Inc.  Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
> Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
> --
> "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Timur Tabi Nov. 15, 2017, 3:14 p.m. | #2
On 11/15/2017 12:47 AM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>> +	if (id->driver_data == QDF2XXX_V1) {
>> +		avail_gpios = num_gpios;
>> +
>> +		gpios = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, avail_gpios, sizeof(gpios[0]),
>> +				     GFP_KERNEL);
> Wouldn't kmalloc suffice since the array gets initialized just below.

Sure.

>> +		if (!gpios)
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +		for (i = 0; i < avail_gpios; i++)
>> +			gpios[i] = i;
>> +	} else {
>> +		/* The number of GPIOs in the approved list */
>> +		ret = device_property_read_u16_array(&pdev->dev, "gpios",
>> +						     NULL, 0);
>> +		if (ret < 0) {
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing 'num-gpios' property\n");
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +		if (!ret || ret > MAX_GPIOS) {
> Instead of ret > MAX_GPIOS, should we check for ret > num_gpios?

Yes.

> 
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid 'num-gpios' property\n");
>> +			return -ENODEV;
>> +		}
> In both the above error messages 'num-gpios' should be 'gpios'

Thanks, I not sure how that got messed up.

> 
>> +		avail_gpios = ret;
>> +
>> +		gpios = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, avail_gpios, sizeof(gpios[0]),
>> +				     GFP_KERNEL);
> devm_kmalloc?

Ok.

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c
index bb3ce5c3e18b..37f746f6eb8c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c
@@ -38,68 +38,147 @@ 
 /* maximum size of each gpio name (enough room for "gpioXXX" + null) */
 #define NAME_SIZE	8
 
+enum {
+	QDF2XXX_V1,
+	QDF2XXX_V2,
+};
+
+static const struct acpi_device_id qdf2xxx_acpi_ids[] = {
+	{"QCOM8001", QDF2XXX_V1},
+	{"QCOM8002", QDF2XXX_V2},
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, qdf2xxx_acpi_ids);
+
 static int qdf2xxx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	const struct acpi_device_id *id =
+		acpi_match_device(qdf2xxx_acpi_ids, &pdev->dev);
 	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
 	struct msm_pingroup *groups;
 	char (*names)[NAME_SIZE];
 	unsigned int i;
 	u32 num_gpios;
+	unsigned int avail_gpios; /* The number of GPIOs we support */
+	u16 *gpios; /* An array of supported GPIOs */
 	int ret;
 
 	/* Query the number of GPIOs from ACPI */
 	ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "num-gpios", &num_gpios);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "missing num-gpios property\n");
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing 'num-gpios' property\n");
 		return ret;
 	}
-
 	if (!num_gpios || num_gpios > MAX_GPIOS) {
-		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "invalid num-gpios property\n");
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid 'num-gpios' property\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * The QCOM8001 HID contains only the number of GPIOs, and assumes
+	 * that all of them are available. avail_gpios is the same as num_gpios.
+	 *
+	 * The QCOM8002 HID introduces the 'gpios' DSD, which lists
+	 * specific GPIOs that the driver is allowed to access.
+	 *
+	 * The make the common code simpler, in both cases we create an
+	 * array of GPIOs that are accessible.  So for QCOM8001, that would
+	 * be all of the GPIOs.
+	 */
+	if (id->driver_data == QDF2XXX_V1) {
+		avail_gpios = num_gpios;
+
+		gpios = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, avail_gpios, sizeof(gpios[0]),
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!gpios)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < avail_gpios; i++)
+			gpios[i] = i;
+	} else {
+		/* The number of GPIOs in the approved list */
+		ret = device_property_read_u16_array(&pdev->dev, "gpios",
+						     NULL, 0);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing 'num-gpios' property\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+		if (!ret || ret > MAX_GPIOS) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid 'num-gpios' property\n");
+			return -ENODEV;
+		}
+		avail_gpios = ret;
+
+		gpios = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, avail_gpios, sizeof(gpios[0]),
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!gpios)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		ret = device_property_read_u16_array(&pdev->dev, "gpios", gpios,
+						     avail_gpios);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not read list of GPIOs\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Because we have a specific list of GPIOs, the GPIO map
+		 * is 'sparse'.
+		 */
+		qdf2xxx_pinctrl.sparse = true;
+	}
+
 	pins = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_gpios,
 		sizeof(struct pinctrl_pin_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
 	groups = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_gpios,
 		sizeof(struct msm_pingroup), GFP_KERNEL);
-	names = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_gpios, NAME_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	names = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, avail_gpios, NAME_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (!pins || !groups || !names)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	/*
+	 * Initialize the array.  GPIOs not listed in the 'gpios' array
+	 * still need a number, but nothing else.
+	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < num_gpios; i++) {
-		snprintf(names[i], NAME_SIZE, "gpio%u", i);
-
 		pins[i].number = i;
-		pins[i].name = names[i];
-
-		groups[i].npins = 1;
-		groups[i].name = names[i];
 		groups[i].pins = &pins[i].number;
+	}
 
-		groups[i].ctl_reg = 0x10000 * i;
-		groups[i].io_reg = 0x04 + 0x10000 * i;
-		groups[i].intr_cfg_reg = 0x08 + 0x10000 * i;
-		groups[i].intr_status_reg = 0x0c + 0x10000 * i;
-		groups[i].intr_target_reg = 0x08 + 0x10000 * i;
-
-		groups[i].mux_bit = 2;
-		groups[i].pull_bit = 0;
-		groups[i].drv_bit = 6;
-		groups[i].oe_bit = 9;
-		groups[i].in_bit = 0;
-		groups[i].out_bit = 1;
-		groups[i].intr_enable_bit = 0;
-		groups[i].intr_status_bit = 0;
-		groups[i].intr_target_bit = 5;
-		groups[i].intr_target_kpss_val = 1;
-		groups[i].intr_raw_status_bit = 4;
-		groups[i].intr_polarity_bit = 1;
-		groups[i].intr_detection_bit = 2;
-		groups[i].intr_detection_width = 2;
+	/* Populate the entries that are meant to be exposes as GPIOs. */
+	for (i = 0; i < avail_gpios; i++) {
+		unsigned int gpio = gpios[i];
+
+		groups[gpio].npins = 1;
+		snprintf(names[i], NAME_SIZE, "gpio%u", gpio);
+		pins[gpio].name = names[i];
+		groups[gpio].name = names[i];
+
+		groups[gpio].ctl_reg = 0x10000 * gpio;
+		groups[gpio].io_reg = 0x04 + 0x10000 * gpio;
+		groups[gpio].intr_cfg_reg = 0x08 + 0x10000 * gpio;
+		groups[gpio].intr_status_reg = 0x0c + 0x10000 * gpio;
+		groups[gpio].intr_target_reg = 0x08 + 0x10000 * gpio;
+
+		groups[gpio].mux_bit = 2;
+		groups[gpio].pull_bit = 0;
+		groups[gpio].drv_bit = 6;
+		groups[gpio].oe_bit = 9;
+		groups[gpio].in_bit = 0;
+		groups[gpio].out_bit = 1;
+		groups[gpio].intr_enable_bit = 0;
+		groups[gpio].intr_status_bit = 0;
+		groups[gpio].intr_target_bit = 5;
+		groups[gpio].intr_target_kpss_val = 1;
+		groups[gpio].intr_raw_status_bit = 4;
+		groups[gpio].intr_polarity_bit = 1;
+		groups[gpio].intr_detection_bit = 2;
+		groups[gpio].intr_detection_width = 2;
 	}
 
+	devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, gpios);
+
 	qdf2xxx_pinctrl.pins = pins;
 	qdf2xxx_pinctrl.groups = groups;
 	qdf2xxx_pinctrl.npins = num_gpios;
@@ -109,12 +188,6 @@  static int qdf2xxx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return msm_pinctrl_probe(pdev, &qdf2xxx_pinctrl);
 }
 
-static const struct acpi_device_id qdf2xxx_acpi_ids[] = {
-	{"QCOM8001"},
-	{},
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, qdf2xxx_acpi_ids);
-
 static struct platform_driver qdf2xxx_pinctrl_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "qdf2xxx-pinctrl",