Message ID | 20171031112542.10516.61105.stgit@pasha-VirtualBox |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | replay additions | expand |
On 31/10/2017 12:25, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: > > - bdrv_drain_all(); > - replay_disable_events(); > - ret = bdrv_flush_all(); > + if (!replay_events_enabled()) { > + bdrv_drain_all(); > + ret = bdrv_flush_all(); > + } > > return ret; > } > diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c > index 20cebe1..41a13c0 100644 > --- a/migration/savevm.c > +++ b/migration/savevm.c > @@ -2143,8 +2143,8 @@ int save_snapshot(const char *name, Error **errp) > AioContext *aio_context; > > if (!replay_can_snapshot()) { > - monitor_printf(mon, "Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " > - "right now. Try once more later.\n"); > + error_report("Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " > + "right now. Try once more later.\n"); Why this change? Paolo > return ret;
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com] > On 31/10/2017 12:25, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: > > > > - bdrv_drain_all(); > > - replay_disable_events(); > > - ret = bdrv_flush_all(); > > + if (!replay_events_enabled()) { > > + bdrv_drain_all(); > > + ret = bdrv_flush_all(); > > + } > > > > return ret; > > } > > diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c > > index 20cebe1..41a13c0 100644 > > --- a/migration/savevm.c > > +++ b/migration/savevm.c > > @@ -2143,8 +2143,8 @@ int save_snapshot(const char *name, Error **errp) > > AioContext *aio_context; > > > > if (!replay_can_snapshot()) { > > - monitor_printf(mon, "Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " > > - "right now. Try once more later.\n"); > > + error_report("Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " > > + "right now. Try once more later.\n"); > > Why this change? Kind of a mess in changes. It should be in patch 06 which introduce these lines. I'll fix it in the next version. Pavel Dovgalyuk
On 02/11/2017 12:57, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: >> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com] >> On 31/10/2017 12:25, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: >>> >>> - bdrv_drain_all(); >>> - replay_disable_events(); >>> - ret = bdrv_flush_all(); >>> + if (!replay_events_enabled()) { >>> + bdrv_drain_all(); >>> + ret = bdrv_flush_all(); >>> + } >>> >>> return ret; >>> } >>> diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c >>> index 20cebe1..41a13c0 100644 >>> --- a/migration/savevm.c >>> +++ b/migration/savevm.c >>> @@ -2143,8 +2143,8 @@ int save_snapshot(const char *name, Error **errp) >>> AioContext *aio_context; >>> >>> if (!replay_can_snapshot()) { >>> - monitor_printf(mon, "Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " >>> - "right now. Try once more later.\n"); >>> + error_report("Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " >>> + "right now. Try once more later.\n"); >> >> Why this change? > > Kind of a mess in changes. > It should be in patch 06 which introduce these lines. > I'll fix it in the next version. No problem. Remember to delete the \n too since otherwise patchew complains. Paolo
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com] > >>> diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c > >>> index 20cebe1..41a13c0 100644 > >>> --- a/migration/savevm.c > >>> +++ b/migration/savevm.c > >>> @@ -2143,8 +2143,8 @@ int save_snapshot(const char *name, Error **errp) > >>> AioContext *aio_context; > >>> > >>> if (!replay_can_snapshot()) { > >>> - monitor_printf(mon, "Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " > >>> - "right now. Try once more later.\n"); > >>> + error_report("Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " > >>> + "right now. Try once more later.\n"); > >> > >> Why this change? > > > > Kind of a mess in changes. > > It should be in patch 06 which introduce these lines. > > I'll fix it in the next version. > > No problem. Remember to delete the \n too since otherwise patchew > complains. Is this ok for the line over 80 symbols here? Pavel Dovgalyuk
On 02/11/2017 13:04, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: >> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com] >>>>> diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c >>>>> index 20cebe1..41a13c0 100644 >>>>> --- a/migration/savevm.c >>>>> +++ b/migration/savevm.c >>>>> @@ -2143,8 +2143,8 @@ int save_snapshot(const char *name, Error **errp) >>>>> AioContext *aio_context; >>>>> >>>>> if (!replay_can_snapshot()) { >>>>> - monitor_printf(mon, "Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " >>>>> - "right now. Try once more later.\n"); >>>>> + error_report("Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " >>>>> + "right now. Try once more later.\n"); >>>> >>>> Why this change? >>> >>> Kind of a mess in changes. >>> It should be in patch 06 which introduce these lines. >>> I'll fix it in the next version. >> >> No problem. Remember to delete the \n too since otherwise patchew >> complains. > > Is this ok for the line over 80 symbols here? Patchew (and checkpatch) are complaining about the \n in the string, i.e. "later.\n" -> "later.". Thanks, Paolo
diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c index 114c29b..c728f3a 100644 --- a/cpus.c +++ b/cpus.c @@ -942,9 +942,10 @@ static int do_vm_stop(RunState state) qapi_event_send_stop(&error_abort); } - bdrv_drain_all(); - replay_disable_events(); - ret = bdrv_flush_all(); + if (!replay_events_enabled()) { + bdrv_drain_all(); + ret = bdrv_flush_all(); + } return ret; } diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c index 20cebe1..41a13c0 100644 --- a/migration/savevm.c +++ b/migration/savevm.c @@ -2143,8 +2143,8 @@ int save_snapshot(const char *name, Error **errp) AioContext *aio_context; if (!replay_can_snapshot()) { - monitor_printf(mon, "Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " - "right now. Try once more later.\n"); + error_report("Record/replay does not allow making snapshot " + "right now. Try once more later.\n"); return ret; }