mbox series

[GIT,PULL] ARM: Xilinx Zynq SoC patches for v4.15

Message ID e0070498-8a23-3608-ac27-9da816f0d990@xilinx.com
State New
Headers show
Series [GIT,PULL] ARM: Xilinx Zynq SoC patches for v4.15 | expand

Pull-request

https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-soc-for-4.15

Message

Michal Simek Oct. 16, 2017, 12:55 p.m. UTC 
Hi,

please apply the following patch.

Thanks,
Michal

The following changes since commit 2bd6bf03f4c1c59381d62c61d03f6cc3fe71f66e:

  Linux 4.14-rc1 (2017-09-16 15:47:51 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-soc-for-4.15

for you to fetch changes up to 57fc5529972b4c7c424a5fac56508c72ae020796:

  MAINTAINERS: Remove myself as reviewer (2017-10-02 07:57:49 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
arm: Xilinx Zynq patches for v4.15

- Remove Soren from reviewer list

----------------------------------------------------------------
Soren Brinkmann (1):
      MAINTAINERS: Remove myself as reviewer

 MAINTAINERS | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Oct. 19, 2017, 8:52 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> arm: Xilinx Zynq patches for v4.15
>
> - Remove Soren from reviewer list

Pulled into next/soc, thanks!

This would have been a candidate for 4.14 as well, since it's a good idea
to have an up-to-date maintainer entry for the release, but I guess there
are not too many patches you get since there is not that much code.

     Arnd
Michal Simek Oct. 20, 2017, 5:31 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 19.10.2017 22:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> wrote:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> arm: Xilinx Zynq patches for v4.15
>>
>> - Remove Soren from reviewer list
> 
> Pulled into next/soc, thanks!
> 
> This would have been a candidate for 4.14 as well, since it's a good idea
> to have an up-to-date maintainer entry for the release, but I guess there
> are not too many patches you get since there is not that much code.

It is just nice to have and not big deal.

Thanks,
Michal