| Message ID | 20171015180840.GA7305@embeddedor.com |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
| Series | xen/9pfs: mark expected switch fall-through in xen_9pfs_front_changed | expand |
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_xen.c b/net/9p/trans_xen.c index 6ad3e04..7ec5df9 100644 --- a/net/9p/trans_xen.c +++ b/net/9p/trans_xen.c @@ -510,7 +510,8 @@ static void xen_9pfs_front_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; - /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */ + /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state */ + /* fall through */ case XenbusStateClosing: xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break;
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> --- This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used). net/9p/trans_xen.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)