From patchwork Fri Feb  4 23:47:36 2011
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Add SPARC Solaris options from specs to new sparc/sol2.opt
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:47:36 -0000
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 81983
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1102042347140.5791@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
To: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
 rth@redhat.com, davem@redhat.com, jakub@redhat.com

On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:

> Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> writes:
> 
> >> Tested building cc1 and xgcc for cross to sparc-solaris2.8.  OK to
> >> commit?  (Or, in the alternative, OK to commit the obvious patch to
> >> remove %{sun4:} %{target:} from specs in sol2-bi.h?)
> >
> > I'd personally be in favor of the latter solution.  What do you think, Rainer?
> 
> Me too.  I couldn't find any hint of -sun4 or -target (with or without
> sun4) in not-too-ancient Studio compilers.  This stuff seems like
> ancient (as in SunOS 4) history to me, so good riddance.

Is this alternative patch OK, then?

2011-02-04  Joseph Myers  <joseph@codesourcery.com>

	* config/sparc/sol2-bi.h (CC1_SPEC): Remove %{sun4:} %{target:}.


Index: gcc/config/sparc/sol2-bi.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/sparc/sol2-bi.h	(revision 169841)
+++ gcc/config/sparc/sol2-bi.h	(working copy)
@@ -229,14 +229,12 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTI
 #undef	CC1_SPEC
 #if DEFAULT_ARCH32_P
 #define CC1_SPEC "\
-%{sun4:} %{target:} \
 %{m64:%{m32:%emay not use both -m32 and -m64}} \
 %{m64:-mptr64 -mstack-bias -mno-v8plus \
   %{!mcpu*:-%{!mv8plus:mcpu=v9}}} \
 "
 #else
 #define CC1_SPEC "\
-%{sun4:} %{target:} \
 %{m32:%{m64:%emay not use both -m32 and -m64}} \
 %{m32:-mptr32 -mno-stack-bias \
   %{!mcpu*:%{!mv8plus:-mcpu=v9}}} \