From patchwork Fri Feb  4 23:47:36 2011
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 81983
Return-Path: 
 <gcc-patches-return-284634-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A0A1B70FF
	for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;
	Sat,  5 Feb 2011 10:47:47 +1100 (EST)
Received: (qmail 28666 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2011 23:47:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 28658 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2011 23:47:44 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL, BAYES_00, TW_XG,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com)
	(38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with
	ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 23:47:40 +0000
Received: (qmail 12370 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2011 23:47:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by
	mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 4 Feb 2011 23:47:38 -0000
Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost)	by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with
	local-esmtp (Exim 4.72)	(envelope-from
	<joseph@codesourcery.com>)	id 1PlVNI-0002J8-QR;
	Fri, 04 Feb 2011 23:47:36 +0000
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:47:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	rth@redhat.com, davem@redhat.com, jakub@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Add SPARC Solaris options from specs to new sparc/sol2.opt
In-Reply-To: <ydd39o3q1r1.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1102042347140.5791@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1102040140400.18971@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
	<201102040955.06608.ebotcazou@adacore.com>
	<ydd39o3q1r1.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:gcc-patches-unsubscribe-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:

> Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> writes:
> 
> >> Tested building cc1 and xgcc for cross to sparc-solaris2.8.  OK to
> >> commit?  (Or, in the alternative, OK to commit the obvious patch to
> >> remove %{sun4:} %{target:} from specs in sol2-bi.h?)
> >
> > I'd personally be in favor of the latter solution.  What do you think, Rainer?
> 
> Me too.  I couldn't find any hint of -sun4 or -target (with or without
> sun4) in not-too-ancient Studio compilers.  This stuff seems like
> ancient (as in SunOS 4) history to me, so good riddance.

Is this alternative patch OK, then?

2011-02-04  Joseph Myers  <joseph@codesourcery.com>

	* config/sparc/sol2-bi.h (CC1_SPEC): Remove %{sun4:} %{target:}.

Index: gcc/config/sparc/sol2-bi.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/sparc/sol2-bi.h	(revision 169841)
+++ gcc/config/sparc/sol2-bi.h	(working copy)
@@ -229,14 +229,12 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTI
 #undef	CC1_SPEC
 #if DEFAULT_ARCH32_P
 #define CC1_SPEC "\
-%{sun4:} %{target:} \
 %{m64:%{m32:%emay not use both -m32 and -m64}} \
 %{m64:-mptr64 -mstack-bias -mno-v8plus \
   %{!mcpu*:-%{!mv8plus:mcpu=v9}}} \
 "
 #else
 #define CC1_SPEC "\
-%{sun4:} %{target:} \
 %{m32:%{m64:%emay not use both -m32 and -m64}} \
 %{m32:-mptr32 -mno-stack-bias \
   %{!mcpu*:%{!mv8plus:-mcpu=v9}}} \