@@ -282,13 +282,13 @@ static int rv3029_eeprom_read(struct device *dev, u8 reg,
static int rv3029_eeprom_write(struct device *dev, u8 reg,
u8 const buf[], size_t len)
{
- int ret, err;
+ int ret;
size_t i;
u8 tmp;
- err = rv3029_eeprom_enter(dev);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
+ ret = rv3029_eeprom_enter(dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
for (i = 0; i < len; i++, reg++) {
ret = rv3029_read_regs(dev, reg, &tmp, 1);
@@ -304,11 +304,11 @@ static int rv3029_eeprom_write(struct device *dev, u8 reg,
break;
}
- err = rv3029_eeprom_exit(dev);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
+ ret = rv3029_eeprom_exit(dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int rv3029_eeprom_update_bits(struct device *dev,
We don't need both "ret" and "err" when they do the same thing. All the functions called here return zero on success or negative error codes. It's more clear to return a literal zero at the end instead of "return ret;" Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>