From patchwork Fri Sep 8 18:06:54 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Laurent Dufour X-Patchwork-Id: 811792 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [103.22.144.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xpmMj2WqYz9s82 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 04:40:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3xpmMj0K24zDrVq for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 04:40:01 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xplfY5Wv2zDrVn for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 04:07:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v88I4SNS021455 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 14:07:47 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2cuuu8x79c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:07:47 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:07:45 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.145) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:07:38 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v88I7cje18219056; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 18:07:38 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AB442041; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:04:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C16042042; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:04:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from nimbus.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.31.125]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:04:03 +0100 (BST) From: Laurent Dufour To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: [PATCH v3 10/20] mm: Introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 20:06:54 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1504894024-2750-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1504894024-2750-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17090818-0020-0000-0000-000003B69F46 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17090818-0021-0000-0000-00004247AAAB Message-Id: <1504894024-2750-11-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-09-08_12:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=2 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1709080270 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Tim Chen , haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The speculative page fault handler which is run without holding the mmap_sem is calling lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() but the vm_flags is not guaranteed to remain constant. Introducing __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() which has the vma flags value parameter instead of the vma pointer. Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- include/linux/swap.h | 11 +++++++++-- mm/memory.c | 8 ++++---- mm/swap.c | 12 ++++++------ 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h index 8a807292037f..9b4dbb98af89 100644 --- a/include/linux/swap.h +++ b/include/linux/swap.h @@ -323,8 +323,15 @@ extern void swap_setup(void); extern void add_page_to_unevictable_list(struct page *page); -extern void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, - struct vm_area_struct *vma); +extern void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, + unsigned long vma_flags); + +static inline void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, + struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + return __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma->vm_flags); +} + /* linux/mm/vmscan.c */ extern unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone); diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index a4982917c16e..4583f354be94 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -2509,7 +2509,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) ptep_clear_flush_notify(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte); page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(new_page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vmf->vma_flags); /* * We call the notify macro here because, when using secondary * mmu page tables (such as kvm shadow page tables), we want the @@ -2998,7 +2998,7 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) } else { /* ksm created a completely new copy */ page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags); } swap_free(entry); @@ -3144,7 +3144,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES); page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags); setpte: set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte, entry); @@ -3396,7 +3396,7 @@ int alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES); page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags); } else { inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, mm_counter_file(page)); page_add_file_rmap(page, false); diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index 9295ae960d66..b084bb16d769 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -470,21 +470,21 @@ void add_page_to_unevictable_list(struct page *page) } /** - * lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable - * @page: the page to be added to LRU - * @vma: vma in which page is mapped for determining reclaimability + * __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable + * @page: the page to be added to LRU + * @vma_flags: vma in which page is mapped for determining reclaimability * * Place @page on the active or unevictable LRU list, depending on its * evictability. Note that if the page is not evictable, it goes * directly back onto it's zone's unevictable list, it does NOT use a * per cpu pagevec. */ -void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, - struct vm_area_struct *vma) +void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, + unsigned long vma_flags) { VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page); - if (likely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED)) { + if (likely((vma_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED)) { SetPageActive(page); lru_cache_add(page); return;