From patchwork Fri Sep 8 18:06:46 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Laurent Dufour X-Patchwork-Id: 811778 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xplpd0zmZz9ryk for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 04:14:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3xplpc73sZzDqY8 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 04:14:48 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xplf52hfrzDrVj for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 04:07:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v88I7F9t104866 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 14:07:23 -0400 Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.109]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2cuys51407-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:07:23 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:07:20 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.143) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:07:14 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v88I7DKg24838164; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 18:07:13 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF9A4203F; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:03:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888A842041; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:03:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from nimbus.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.31.125]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:03:38 +0100 (BST) From: Laurent Dufour To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: [PATCH v3 02/20] mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 20:06:46 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1504894024-2750-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1504894024-2750-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17090818-0012-0000-0000-00000577A9A4 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17090818-0013-0000-0000-000018F0B120 Message-Id: <1504894024-2750-3-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-09-08_12:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=2 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1709080270 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Tim Chen , haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Peter Zijlstra When speculating faults (without holding mmap_sem) we need to validate that the vma against which we loaded pages is still valid when we're ready to install the new PTE. Therefore, replace the pte_offset_map_lock() calls that (re)take the PTL with pte_map_lock() which can fail in case we find the VMA changed since we started the fault. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) [Port to 4.12 kernel] [Remove the comment about the fault_env structure which has been implemented as the vm_fault structure in the kernel] Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- include/linux/mm.h | 1 + mm/memory.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 68be41b31ad0..46e769a5a7ab 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ extern pgprot_t protection_map[16]; #define FAULT_FLAG_USER 0x40 /* The fault originated in userspace */ #define FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE 0x80 /* faulting for non current tsk/mm */ #define FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION 0x100 /* The fault was during an instruction fetch */ +#define FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE 0x200 /* Speculative fault, not holding mmap_sem */ #define FAULT_FLAG_TRACE \ { FAULT_FLAG_WRITE, "WRITE" }, \ diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 30bccfa00630..13c8c3c8b5e4 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -2408,6 +2408,12 @@ static inline void wp_page_reuse(struct vm_fault *vmf) pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); } +static bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf) +{ + vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); + return true; +} + /* * Handle the case of a page which we actually need to copy to a new page. * @@ -2435,6 +2441,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) const unsigned long mmun_start = vmf->address & PAGE_MASK; const unsigned long mmun_end = mmun_start + PAGE_SIZE; struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + int ret = VM_FAULT_OOM; if (unlikely(anon_vma_prepare(vma))) goto oom; @@ -2462,7 +2469,11 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) /* * Re-check the pte - we dropped the lock */ - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) { + mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(new_page, memcg, false); + ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY; + goto oom_free_new; + } if (likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) { if (old_page) { if (!PageAnon(old_page)) { @@ -2550,7 +2561,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) oom: if (old_page) put_page(old_page); - return VM_FAULT_OOM; + return ret; } /** @@ -2571,8 +2582,8 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) int finish_mkwrite_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) { WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)); - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, - &vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) + return VM_FAULT_RETRY; /* * We might have raced with another page fault while we released the * pte_offset_map_lock. @@ -2690,8 +2701,11 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) get_page(vmf->page); pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); lock_page(vmf->page); - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, - vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) { + unlock_page(vmf->page); + put_page(vmf->page); + return VM_FAULT_RETRY; + } if (!pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)) { unlock_page(vmf->page); pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); @@ -2868,8 +2882,10 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) * Back out if somebody else faulted in this pte * while we released the pte lock. */ - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, - vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) { + delayacct_clear_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN); + return VM_FAULT_RETRY; + } if (likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) ret = VM_FAULT_OOM; delayacct_clear_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN); @@ -2925,8 +2941,11 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) /* * Back out if somebody else already faulted in this pte. */ - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, - &vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) { + ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY; + mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false); + goto out_page; + } if (unlikely(!pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) goto out_nomap; @@ -3053,8 +3072,8 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) !mm_forbids_zeropage(vma->vm_mm)) { entry = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(vmf->address), vma->vm_page_prot)); - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, - vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) + return VM_FAULT_RETRY; if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte)) goto unlock; ret = check_stable_address_space(vma->vm_mm); @@ -3089,8 +3108,11 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) if (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) entry = pte_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry)); - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, - &vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) { + mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false); + put_page(page); + return VM_FAULT_RETRY; + } if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte)) goto release; @@ -3214,8 +3236,9 @@ static int pte_alloc_one_map(struct vm_fault *vmf) * pte_none() under vmf->ptl protection when we return to * alloc_set_pte(). */ - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, - &vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) + return VM_FAULT_RETRY; + return 0; }