Message ID | CAK7LNAQpsNrrrL2T8J1QYjA+9cmj8UO3JdTCZ7_WLGfdWC4G7w@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > UniPhier ARM SoC DT updates for v4.14 > > - complete migrating to SPDX License Identifier > - remove support for old SoC > - add nodes for NAND, Audio pinctrl > - replace /include/ with #include > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Katsuhiro Suzuki (1): > ARM: dts: uniphier: add audio out pin-mux node > > Masahiro Yamada (4): > ARM: dts: uniphier: use SPDX-License-Identifier (2nd) > ARM: dts: uniphier: remove sLD3 SoC support > ARM: dts: uniphier use #include instead of /include/ > ARM: dts: uniphier: add Denali NAND controller node Pulled into next/dt, but please clarify one question: How likely is it that there are still users of the sLD3 SoC on mainline kernels? The commit just states that it is too hard to maintain, but the more important question is whether anyone cares about it breaking. Arnd
Hi Arnd, 2017-08-17 6:31 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Masahiro Yamada > <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> UniPhier ARM SoC DT updates for v4.14 >> >> - complete migrating to SPDX License Identifier >> - remove support for old SoC >> - add nodes for NAND, Audio pinctrl >> - replace /include/ with #include >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Katsuhiro Suzuki (1): >> ARM: dts: uniphier: add audio out pin-mux node >> >> Masahiro Yamada (4): >> ARM: dts: uniphier: use SPDX-License-Identifier (2nd) >> ARM: dts: uniphier: remove sLD3 SoC support >> ARM: dts: uniphier use #include instead of /include/ >> ARM: dts: uniphier: add Denali NAND controller node > > Pulled into next/dt, but please clarify one question: > > How likely is it that there are still users of the sLD3 SoC on > mainline kernels? The commit just states that it is too hard > to maintain, but the more important question is whether anyone > cares about it breaking. > > Arnd Nobody cared. I tried to maintain it for completeness (then finally I gave up), but nobody is using it.