Message ID | 20170807081636.65099-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
On 08/07/2017 10:16 AM, Thomas Richter wrote: > Commit 18f3d6be6be1 ("selftests/bpf: Add test cases to test narrower ctx field loads") > introduced new eBPF test cases. One of them (test_pkt_md_access.c) > fails on s390x. The BPF verifier error message is: > > [root@s8360046 bpf]# ./test_progs > test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 349 nsec > test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 212 nsec > [....] > libbpf: load bpf program failed: Permission denied > libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG --- > libbpf: > 0: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0) > invalid bpf_context access off=0 size=1 > > libbpf: -- END LOG -- > libbpf: failed to load program 'test1' > libbpf: failed to load object './test_pkt_md_access.o' > Summary: 29 PASSED, 1 FAILED > [root@s8360046 bpf]# > > This is caused by a byte endianness issue. S390x is a big endian > architecture. Pointer access to the lowest byte or halfword of a > four byte value need to add an offset. > On little endian architectures this offset is not needed. > > Fix this and use the same approach as the originator used for other files > (for example test_verifier.c) in his original commit. > > With this fix the test program test_progs succeeds on s390x: > [root@s8360046 bpf]# ./test_progs > test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 236 nsec > test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 217 nsec > test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 3624 nsec > test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1722 nsec > test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 926 nsec > test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 1322 nsec > test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-fd-by-notexist-prog-id 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-fd-by-notexist-map-id 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(fd) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-info(fd) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(fd) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-info(fd) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check total prog id found by get_next_id 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check get-map-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check get-map-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec > test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check total map id found by get_next_id 0 nsec > test_pkt_md_access:PASS: 277 nsec > Summary: 30 PASSED, 0 FAILED > [root@s8360046 bpf]# Fixes: 18f3d6be6be1 ("selftests/bpf: Add test cases to test narrower ctx field loads") > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> (Patch is for -net tree.) Thanks Thomas!
From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:16:36 +0200 > Commit 18f3d6be6be1 ("selftests/bpf: Add test cases to test narrower ctx field loads") > introduced new eBPF test cases. One of them (test_pkt_md_access.c) > fails on s390x. The BPF verifier error message is: > > [root@s8360046 bpf]# ./test_progs > test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 349 nsec > test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 212 nsec > [....] > libbpf: load bpf program failed: Permission denied > libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG --- > libbpf: > 0: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0) > invalid bpf_context access off=0 size=1 > > libbpf: -- END LOG -- > libbpf: failed to load program 'test1' > libbpf: failed to load object './test_pkt_md_access.o' > Summary: 29 PASSED, 1 FAILED > [root@s8360046 bpf]# > > This is caused by a byte endianness issue. S390x is a big endian > architecture. Pointer access to the lowest byte or halfword of a > four byte value need to add an offset. > On little endian architectures this offset is not needed. > > Fix this and use the same approach as the originator used for other files > (for example test_verifier.c) in his original commit. > > With this fix the test program test_progs succeeds on s390x: ... > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_md_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_md_access.c index 71729d4..7956302 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_md_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_md_access.c @@ -12,12 +12,23 @@ int _version SEC("version") = 1; +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ #define TEST_FIELD(TYPE, FIELD, MASK) \ { \ TYPE tmp = *(volatile TYPE *)&skb->FIELD; \ if (tmp != ((*(volatile __u32 *)&skb->FIELD) & MASK)) \ return TC_ACT_SHOT; \ } +#else +#define TEST_FIELD_OFFSET(a, b) ((sizeof(a) - sizeof(b)) / sizeof(b)) +#define TEST_FIELD(TYPE, FIELD, MASK) \ + { \ + TYPE tmp = *((volatile TYPE *)&skb->FIELD + \ + TEST_FIELD_OFFSET(skb->FIELD, TYPE)); \ + if (tmp != ((*(volatile __u32 *)&skb->FIELD) & MASK)) \ + return TC_ACT_SHOT; \ + } +#endif SEC("test1") int process(struct __sk_buff *skb)