Comments
Patch
===================================================================
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
</para>
<para>
The primary author of the checking code, Jeremy Siek, had already
- started work on a replacement implementation. The new code has been
+ started work on a replacement implementation. The new code was
formally reviewed and accepted into
<link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.boost.org/libs/concept_check/concept_check.htm">the
Boost libraries</link>, and we are pleased to incorporate it into the
@@ -116,10 +116,12 @@
</para>
<para>
- Please note that the upcoming C++ standard has first-class
- support for template parameter constraints based on concepts in the core
- language. This will obviate the need for the library-simulated concept
- checking described above.
+ Please note that the checks are based on the requirements in the original
+ C++ standard, some of which have changed in the upcoming C++0x revision.
+ Additionally, some correct code might be rejected by the concept checks,
+ for example template argument types may need to be complete when used in
+ a template definition, rather than at the point of instantiation.
+ There are no plans to address these shortcomings.
</para>
</section>
fix the anachronism pointed out in PR 47380 2011-01-20 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> * doc/xml/manual/diagnostics.xml: Replace note about C++0x concepts. committed to trunk