From patchwork Thu Jan 20 16:23:22 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Avoid creating (mem (debug_implict_ptr)) (PR debug/47283) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:23:22 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek X-Patchwork-Id: 79720 Message-Id: <20110120162322.GX2724@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi! MEMs for something that is not addressable just confuse the aliasing code (expectedly) and furthermore result in unnecessarily large location description (DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer followed by DW_OP_deref*). This patch in that case just uses the COMPONENT_REF/ARRAY_REF etc. handling code, which will expand it as a SUBREG or similar. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2011-01-20 Jakub Jelinek PR debug/47283 * cfgexpand.c (expand_debug_expr): Instead of generating (mem (debug_implicit_ptr)) for MEM_REFs use COMPONENT_REF etc. handling. * g++.dg/debug/pr47283.C: New test. Jakub --- gcc/cfgexpand.c.jj 2011-01-03 09:54:28.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/cfgexpand.c 2011-01-20 09:59:09.000000000 +0100 @@ -2567,6 +2567,13 @@ expand_debug_expr (tree exp) if (TREE_CODE (exp) == MEM_REF) { + if (GET_CODE (op0) == DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR + || (GET_CODE (op0) == PLUS + && GET_CODE (XEXP (op0, 0)) == DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR)) + /* (mem (debug_implicit_ptr)) might confuse aliasing. + Instead just use get_inner_reference. */ + goto component_ref; + op1 = expand_debug_expr (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 1)); if (!op1 || !CONST_INT_P (op1)) return NULL; @@ -2605,6 +2612,7 @@ expand_debug_expr (tree exp) return op0; + component_ref: case ARRAY_REF: case ARRAY_RANGE_REF: case COMPONENT_REF: --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/pr47283.C.jj 2011-01-20 10:11:09.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/pr47283.C 2011-01-20 10:13:16.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +// PR debug/47283 +// { dg-do compile } + +template inline const T & +f1 (const T &a, const T &b) +{ + if (a < b) + return b; + return a; +}; + +struct A +{ + A (int w, int h) { a1 = w; } + A f2 (const A &) const; + int a1, a2; +}; + +inline A +A::f2 (const A &x) const +{ + return A (f1 (a1, x.a1), f1 (a2, x.a2)); +}; + +struct B +{ + A f3 () const; + void f4 (const A &) { b2 = 5 + b1; } + int b1, b2; +}; + +struct C +{ +}; + +struct D +{ + virtual C f5 (const C &) const; +}; + +struct E +{ + C f6 () const; + int f7 () const; + virtual B f8 (const C &) const; + A f9 () const; + virtual void f10 (); + struct F { D *h; } *d; +}; + +void +E::f10 () +{ + const C c = d->h->f5 (f6 ()); + B b = f8 (c); + b.f4 (b.f3 ().f2 (f9 ())); + f7 (); +}