Comments
Patch
===================================================================
@@ -1045,13 +1045,15 @@
| (warn_traditional << 2)
| (flag_iso << 3)
| (warn_long_long << 4)
- | (warn_cxx_compat << 5));
+ | (warn_cxx_compat << 5)
+ | (warn_overlength_strings << 6));
cpp_opts->cpp_pedantic = pedantic = 0;
warn_pointer_arith = 0;
cpp_opts->cpp_warn_traditional = warn_traditional = 0;
flag_iso = 0;
cpp_opts->cpp_warn_long_long = warn_long_long = 0;
warn_cxx_compat = 0;
+ warn_overlength_strings = 0;
return ret;
}
@@ -1067,6 +1069,7 @@
flag_iso = (flags >> 3) & 1;
cpp_opts->cpp_warn_long_long = warn_long_long = (flags >> 4) & 1;
warn_cxx_compat = (flags >> 5) & 1;
+ warn_overlength_strings = (flags >> 6) & 1;
}
/* Possibly kinds of declarator to parse. */
===================================================================
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* -Woverlength-strings complains about string constants which are too long
+ for the C standard's "minimum maximum" limits. It is off by default,
+ but implied by -pedantic. */
+
+/* { dg-options "-std=c89 -pedantic" } */
+
+#define TEN "xxxxxxxxxx"
+#define HUN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN
+#define THO HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN
+
+/* C89's minimum-maximum is 509. */
+const char x510[] = __extension__ HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN TEN;
+
+/* C99's minimum-maximum is 4095. */
+const char x4096[] = __extension__
+ THO THO THO THO /* 4000 */
+ TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN /* 4050 */
+ TEN TEN TEN TEN /* 4090 */
+ "123456";
===================================================================
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* -Woverlength-strings complains about string constants which are too long
+ for the C standard's "minimum maximum" limits. It is off by default,
+ but implied by -pedantic. */
+
+/* { dg-options "-std=c90 -pedantic" } */
+
+#define TEN "xxxxxxxxxx"
+#define HUN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN
+#define THO HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN
+
+/* C89's minimum-maximum is 509. */
+const char x510[] = __extension__ HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN TEN;
+
+/* C99's minimum-maximum is 4095. */
+const char x4096[] = __extension__
+ THO THO THO THO /* 4000 */
+ TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN /* 4050 */
+ TEN TEN TEN TEN /* 4090 */
+ "123456";
===================================================================
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* -Woverlength-strings complains about string constants which are too long
+ for the C standard's "minimum maximum" limits. It is off by default,
+ but implied by -pedantic. */
+
+/* { dg-options "-std=c99 -pedantic" } */
+
+#define TEN "xxxxxxxxxx"
+#define HUN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN
+#define THO HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN
+
+/* C89's minimum-maximum is 509. */
+const char x510[] = HUN HUN HUN HUN HUN TEN;
+
+/* C99's minimum-maximum is 4095. */
+const char x4096[] = __extension__
+ THO THO THO THO /* 4000 */
+ TEN TEN TEN TEN TEN /* 4050 */
+ TEN TEN TEN TEN /* 4090 */
+ "123456";
SystemTap has some macros that can cause long strings to be generated. See: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 The usual system header exception does not suppress the overlength-string warning here because the string results from a macro expansion. While Dodji's pending patch series promises to be able to fix this, it seemed to me that __extension__ should also be able to do this directly. This patch changes the C parser to suppress the -Woverlength-strings warning when the string is preceded by __extension__. Built and regtested on x86-64 (compile farm). New tests included. Ok? If approved, I assume I need to wait for stage 1 to commit this. Tom 2011-01-18 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> * c-parser.c (disable_extension_diagnostics): Save warn_overlength_strings. (restore_extension_diagnostics): Restore warn_overlength_strings. 2011-01-18 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> * gcc.dg/Woverlength-strings-pedantic-c89-ext.c: New file. * gcc.dg/Woverlength-strings-pedantic-c90-ext.c: New file. * gcc.dg/Woverlength-strings-pedantic-c99-ext.c: New file.